[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YEuEQ79AE0+BoV87@elver.google.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:09:55 +0100
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] kasan: docs: update shadow memory section
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:24PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Update the "Shadow memory" section in KASAN documentation:
>
> - Rearrange the introduction paragraph do it doesn't give a
> "KASAN has an issue" impression.
> - Update the list of architectures with vmalloc support.
> - Punctuation, readability, and other minor clean-ups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> ---
> Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
> index 2744ae6347c6..d0c1796122df 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
> @@ -304,14 +304,11 @@ checking gets disabled.
> Shadow memory
> -------------
>
> -The kernel maps memory in a number of different parts of the address
> -space. This poses something of a problem for KASAN, which requires
> -that all addresses accessed by instrumented code have a valid shadow
> -region.
> -
> -The range of kernel virtual addresses is large: there is not enough
> -real memory to support a real shadow region for every address that
> -could be accessed by the kernel.
> +The kernel maps memory in several different parts of the address space.
> +The range of kernel virtual addresses is large: there is not enough real
> +memory to support a real shadow region for every address that could be
> +accessed by the kernel. Therefore, KASAN only maps real shadow for certain
> +parts of the address space.
>
> Default behaviour
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> @@ -323,10 +320,9 @@ page is mapped over the shadow area. This read-only shadow page
> declares all memory accesses as permitted.
>
> This presents a problem for modules: they do not live in the linear
> -mapping, but in a dedicated module space. By hooking in to the module
> -allocator, KASAN can temporarily map real shadow memory to cover
> -them. This allows detection of invalid accesses to module globals, for
> -example.
> +mapping but in a dedicated module space. By hooking into the module
> +allocator, KASAN temporarily maps real shadow memory to cover them.
> +This allows detection of invalid accesses to module globals, for example.
>
> This also creates an incompatibility with ``VMAP_STACK``: if the stack
> lives in vmalloc space, it will be shadowed by the read-only page, and
> @@ -337,9 +333,10 @@ CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> With ``CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC``, KASAN can cover vmalloc space at the
> -cost of greater memory usage. Currently this is only supported on x86.
> +cost of greater memory usage. Currently, this is supported on x86,
> +riscv, s390, and powerpc.
>
> -This works by hooking into vmalloc and vmap, and dynamically
> +This works by hooking into vmalloc and vmap and dynamically
> allocating real shadow memory to back the mappings.
>
> Most mappings in vmalloc space are small, requiring less than a full
> @@ -358,10 +355,10 @@ memory.
>
> To avoid the difficulties around swapping mappings around, KASAN expects
> that the part of the shadow region that covers the vmalloc space will
> -not be covered by the early shadow page, but will be left
> -unmapped. This will require changes in arch-specific code.
> +not be covered by the early shadow page but will be left unmapped.
> +This will require changes in arch-specific code.
>
> -This allows ``VMAP_STACK`` support on x86, and can simplify support of
> +This allows ``VMAP_STACK`` support on x86 and can simplify support of
> architectures that do not have a fixed module region.
>
> For developers
> --
> 2.31.0.rc2.261.g7f71774620-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists