[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210313061029.28024-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:40:29 +0530
From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To: tj@...nel.org, lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
corbet@....net, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rdunlap@...radead.org, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] docs: admin-guide: cgroup-v1: Fix typos in the file memory.rst
s/overcommited/overcommitted/
s/Overcommiting/Overcommitting/
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst
index 52688ae34461..0d574fd3f8e3 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst
@@ -360,8 +360,8 @@ U != 0, K = unlimited:
U != 0, K < U:
Kernel memory is a subset of the user memory. This setup is useful in
- deployments where the total amount of memory per-cgroup is overcommited.
- Overcommiting kernel memory limits is definitely not recommended, since the
+ deployments where the total amount of memory per-cgroup is overcommitted.
+ Overcommitting kernel memory limits is definitely not recommended, since the
box can still run out of non-reclaimable memory.
In this case, the admin could set up K so that the sum of all groups is
never greater than the total memory, and freely set U at the cost of his
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists