linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Simplify refclk handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <161566700332.1478170.13745405253404480721@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:23:23 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, robdclark@...omium.org,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Simplify refclk handling

Quoting Douglas Anderson (2021-03-04 15:51:59)
> The clock framework makes it simple to deal with an optional clock.
> You can call clk_get_optional() and if the clock isn't specified it'll
> just return NULL without complaint. It's valid to pass NULL to
> enable/disable/prepare/unprepare. Let's make use of this to simplify
> things a tiny bit.
> 
> NOTE: this makes things look a tad bit asymmetric now since we check
> for NULL before clk_prepare_enable() but not for
> clk_disable_unprepare(). This seemed OK to me. We already have to
> check for NULL in the enable case anyway so why not avoid the extra
> call?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>