lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210314102039.21bbb75d@kant>
Date:   Sun, 14 Mar 2021 10:20:39 +0100
From:   Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:     Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: Use bitwise instead of arithmetic operator
 for flags

On Mar 09 Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
> 
> ./drivers/firewire/core-device.c:973:22-23: WARNING: sum of probable
> bitmasks, consider |.
> 
> ./drivers/firewire/core-device.c:954:22-23: WARNING: sum of probable
> bitmasks, consider |.
> 
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firewire/core-device.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firewire/core-device.c b/drivers/firewire/core-device.c
> index 6821698..e04832d 100644
> --- a/drivers/firewire/core-device.c
> +++ b/drivers/firewire/core-device.c
> @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ static void set_broadcast_channel(struct fw_device *device, int generation)
>  	if (device->bc_implemented == BC_UNKNOWN) {
>  		rcode = fw_run_transaction(card, TCODE_READ_QUADLET_REQUEST,
>  				device->node_id, generation, device->max_speed,
> -				CSR_REGISTER_BASE + CSR_BROADCAST_CHANNEL,
> +				CSR_REGISTER_BASE | CSR_BROADCAST_CHANNEL,
>  				&data, 4);
>  		switch (rcode) {
>  		case RCODE_COMPLETE:
> @@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ static void set_broadcast_channel(struct fw_device *device, int generation)
>  				   BROADCAST_CHANNEL_VALID);
>  		fw_run_transaction(card, TCODE_WRITE_QUADLET_REQUEST,
>  				device->node_id, generation, device->max_speed,
> -				CSR_REGISTER_BASE + CSR_BROADCAST_CHANNEL,
> +				CSR_REGISTER_BASE | CSR_BROADCAST_CHANNEL,
>  				&data, 4);
>  	}
>  }

It's "base address + address offset". The arithmetic operator is correct.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-======--=-= --== -===-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ