[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1cab34f0-dcd1-b8ff-6bab-38ff9adc94b5@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:17:17 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@...il.com>, leoyang.li@....com
Cc: lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: fsl: guts: fix comment syntax in file
On 3/13/21 11:28 PM, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
> The opening comment mark '/**' is used for kernel-doc comments.
> There are certain comments in include/linux/fsl/guts.h which follows this
> syntax, but the content inside does not comply with kernel-doc.
>
> E.g., opening comment for "Freecale 85xx and 86xx Global Utilties
> register set" follows kernel-doc syntax(i.e., '/**'), but the content
> inside does not comply with any kernel-doc specification (function,
> struct, etc).
>
> This causes unwelcomed warning from kernel-doc:
> "warning: expecting prototype for Freecale 85xx and 86xx Global Utilties register set(). Prototype was for __FSL_GUTS_H__() instead"
>
> Replace all such comment occurrences with general comment format,
> i.e. '/*' to pervent kernel-doc from parsing these.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Thanks.
> ---
> * Applies perfectly on next-20210312
>
> include/linux/fsl/guts.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fsl/guts.h b/include/linux/fsl/guts.h
> index 0ac27b233f12..fdb55ca47a4f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fsl/guts.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fsl/guts.h
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> -/**
> +/*
> * Freecale 85xx and 86xx Global Utilties register set
> *
> * Authors: Jeff Brown
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
>
> -/**
> +/*
> * Global Utility Registers.
> *
> * Not all registers defined in this structure are available on all chips, so
>
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists