linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 10 (lib/test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALOAHbBUEZRHHjuNAuREiQYcLn7DoZLuCXj9nYSM2qWg6D=RCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 14 Mar 2021 16:40:39 +0800
From:   Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 10 (lib/test_printf.c)

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 5:52 PM Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue 2021-03-09 21:57:48, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 3/9/21 8:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> >
> > on i386 (at least):
> >
> > ../lib/test_printf.c: In function 'page_flags_test':
> > ../lib/test_printf.c:595:17: error: 'sec' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'sem'?
> >   page_flags |= (sec & SECTIONS_MASK) << SECTIONS_PGSHIFT;
> >                  ^~~
> >
> >
> > Should that be 'section'?
>
> Yup, it looks like.
>
> There seems to be one more problem found by the test robot:
>
>    lib/test_printf.c:595:17: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> >> lib/test_printf.c:612:17: error: 'tag' undeclared (first use in this function)
>      612 |  page_flags |= (tag & KASAN_TAG_MASK) << KASAN_TAG_PGSHIFT;
>
>
> Yafang is going to send a fix. I have temporary removed the
> problematic patch from printk/linux.git, for-next branch.
>
> I am sorry for the troubles. Anyway, it is great that linux-next
> and all the test robots are around.
>

Hi Petr,

I sent a new version v6[1] to fix the test failure and build failure
report by kernel test robot.

Sorry for the late fix as I'm very busy recently.

[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210314083717.96380-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com/T/#t


-- 
Thanks
Yafang