linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.11 026/306] netfilter: x_tables: gpf inside xt_find

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210315135508.510397578@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Mar 2021 14:51:29 +0100
From:   gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.11 026/306] netfilter: x_tables: gpf inside xt_find_revision()

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>

commit 8e24edddad152b998b37a7f583175137ed2e04a5 upstream.

nested target/match_revfn() calls work with xt[NFPROTO_UNSPEC] lists
without taking xt[NFPROTO_UNSPEC].mutex. This can race with module unload
and cause host to crash:

general protection fault: 0000 [#1]
Modules linked in: ... [last unloaded: xt_cluster]
CPU: 0 PID: 542455 Comm: iptables
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8ffbd518>]  [<ffffffff8ffbd518>] strcmp+0x18/0x40
RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffff9a5a5d9abe10 RDI: dead000000000111
R13: ffff9a5a5d9abe10 R14: ffff9a5a5d9abd8c R15: dead000000000100
(VvS: %R15 -- &xt_match,  %RDI -- &xt_match.name,
xt_cluster unregister match in xt[NFPROTO_UNSPEC].match list)
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff902ccf44>] match_revfn+0x54/0xc0
 [<ffffffff902ccf9f>] match_revfn+0xaf/0xc0
 [<ffffffff902cd01e>] xt_find_revision+0x6e/0xf0
 [<ffffffffc05a5be0>] do_ipt_get_ctl+0x100/0x420 [ip_tables]
 [<ffffffff902cc6bf>] nf_getsockopt+0x4f/0x70
 [<ffffffff902dd99e>] ip_getsockopt+0xde/0x100
 [<ffffffff903039b5>] raw_getsockopt+0x25/0x50
 [<ffffffff9026c5da>] sock_common_getsockopt+0x1a/0x20
 [<ffffffff9026b89d>] SyS_getsockopt+0x7d/0xf0
 [<ffffffff903cbf92>] system_call_fastpath+0x25/0x2a

Fixes: 656caff20e1 ("netfilter 04/09: x_tables: fix match/target revision lookup")
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/netfilter/x_tables.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ static int match_revfn(u8 af, const char
 	const struct xt_match *m;
 	int have_rev = 0;

+	mutex_lock(&xt[af].mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry(m, &xt[af].match, list) {
 		if (strcmp(m->name, name) == 0) {
 			if (m->revision > *bestp)
@@ -338,6 +339,7 @@ static int match_revfn(u8 af, const char
 				have_rev = 1;
 		}
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&xt[af].mutex);

 	if (af != NFPROTO_UNSPEC && !have_rev)
 		return match_revfn(NFPROTO_UNSPEC, name, revision, bestp);
@@ -350,6 +352,7 @@ static int target_revfn(u8 af, const cha
 	const struct xt_target *t;
 	int have_rev = 0;

+	mutex_lock(&xt[af].mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry(t, &xt[af].target, list) {
 		if (strcmp(t->name, name) == 0) {
 			if (t->revision > *bestp)
@@ -358,6 +361,7 @@ static int target_revfn(u8 af, const cha
 				have_rev = 1;
 		}
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&xt[af].mutex);

 	if (af != NFPROTO_UNSPEC && !have_rev)
 		return target_revfn(NFPROTO_UNSPEC, name, revision, bestp);
@@ -371,12 +375,10 @@ int xt_find_revision(u8 af, const char *
 {
 	int have_rev, best = -1;

-	mutex_lock(&xt[af].mutex);
 	if (target == 1)
 		have_rev = target_revfn(af, name, revision, &best);
 	else
 		have_rev = match_revfn(af, name, revision, &best);
-	mutex_unlock(&xt[af].mutex);

 	/* Nothing at all?  Return 0 to try loading module. */
 	if (best == -1) {