linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 044/290] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: fix wrong unmap in RX handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210315135543.414029009@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Mar 2021 14:52:17 +0100
From:   gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Biao Huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 044/290] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: fix wrong unmap in RX handling

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

From: Biao Huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>

commit 95b39f07a17faef3a9b225248ba449b976e529c8 upstream.

mtk_star_dma_unmap_rx() should unmap the dma_addr of old skb rather than
that of new skb.
Assign new_dma_addr to desc_data.dma_addr after all handling of old skb
ends to avoid unexpected receive side error.

Fixes: f96e9641e92b ("net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: fix error path in RX handling")
Signed-off-by: Biao Huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c
@@ -1225,8 +1225,6 @@ static int mtk_star_receive_packet(struc
 		goto push_new_skb;
 	}
 
-	desc_data.dma_addr = new_dma_addr;
-
 	/* We can't fail anymore at this point: it's safe to unmap the skb. */
 	mtk_star_dma_unmap_rx(priv, &desc_data);
 
@@ -1236,6 +1234,9 @@ static int mtk_star_receive_packet(struc
 	desc_data.skb->dev = ndev;
 	netif_receive_skb(desc_data.skb);
 
+	/* update dma_addr for new skb */
+	desc_data.dma_addr = new_dma_addr;
+
 push_new_skb:
 	desc_data.len = skb_tailroom(new_skb);
 	desc_data.skb = new_skb;