lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQEYAiV7+19LXNs8-HjWNLvX4hGLvDVMjLXrshLb4BawQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Mar 2021 01:24:16 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Cc:     Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: kbuild: Fix a typo in the file Kconfig.recursion-issue-02

On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 1:33 PM Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> s/sematics/semantics/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
> ---

Applied to linux-kbuild. Thanks.


>  Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02 | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02 b/Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02
> index df245fd7670d..0034eb494d11 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02
> +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
>  # make KBUILD_KCONFIG=Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02 allnoconfig
>  #
>  # The recursive limitations with Kconfig has some non intuitive implications on
> -# kconfig sematics which are documented here. One known practical implication
> +# kconfig semantics which are documented here. One known practical implication
>  # of the recursive limitation is that drivers cannot negate features from other
>  # drivers if they share a common core requirement and use disjoint semantics to
>  # annotate those requirements, ie, some drivers use "depends on" while others
> --
> 2.26.2
>


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ