[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210315154421.11463-1-erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:44:21 +0100
From: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Jiafei Pan <Jiafei.Pan@....com>,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Gabbasov <andrew_gabbasov@...tor.com>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@...il.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
Subject: [PATCH] softirq: Be more verbose on t->state BUG()
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>
In case this BUG() is hit, it helps debugging a lot to get an idea
what tasklet is the root cause. So, be slightly more verbose here.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>
Signed-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
---
kernel/softirq.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 9908ec4a9bfe..a6b602ad48d6 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -550,9 +550,13 @@ static void tasklet_action_common(struct softirq_action *a,
if (tasklet_trylock(t)) {
if (!atomic_read(&t->count)) {
- if (!test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED,
- &t->state))
+ if (!test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
+ if (t->use_callback)
+ pr_emerg("tasklet failed, cb: %pS\n", t->callback);
+ else
+ pr_emerg("tasklet failed, func: %pS\n", t->func);
BUG();
+ }
if (t->use_callback)
t->callback(t);
else
--
2.29.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists