linux-kernel - [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: try oom if reclaim is unable to make forward progress

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:58:37 +0000
From:   Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
To:     linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: try oom if reclaim is unable to make forward progress

In the situation where direct reclaim is required to make progress for
compaction but no_progress_loops is already over the limit of
MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES consider invoking the oom killer.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 7a2c89b21115..8d748b1b8d1e 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4181,6 +4181,16 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static inline bool
+should_try_oom(int no_progress_loops,
+		enum compact_result last_compact_result)
+{
+	if (no_progress_loops > MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES && last_compact_result
+			== COMPACT_SKIPPED)
+		return true;
+	return false;
+}
+
 static inline bool
 should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, int order, int alloc_flags,
 		     enum compact_result compact_result,
@@ -4547,10 +4557,11 @@ should_reclaim_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned order,
 	 * Make sure we converge to OOM if we cannot make any progress
 	 * several times in the row.
 	 */
-	if (*no_progress_loops > MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES) {
-		/* Before OOM, exhaust highatomic_reserve */
-		return unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(ac, true);
-	}
+	if (*no_progress_loops > MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES)
+		result false;
+	/* Last chance before OOM, try draining highatomic_reserve once */
+	else if (*no_progress_loops == MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES)
+		return unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(ac, true)
 
 	/*
 	 * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead
@@ -4822,6 +4833,8 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 				 did_some_progress > 0, &no_progress_loops))
 		goto retry;
 
+	if (should_try_oom(no_progress_loops, compact_result))
+		goto oom:
 	/*
 	 * It doesn't make any sense to retry for the compaction if the order-0
 	 * reclaim is not able to make any progress because the current
@@ -4839,6 +4852,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 	if (check_retry_cpuset(cpuset_mems_cookie, ac))
 		goto retry_cpuset;
 
+oom:
 	/* Reclaim has failed us, start killing things */
 	page = __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_mask, order, ac, &did_some_progress);
 	if (page)
-- 
2.26.2