[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65a85dd1-a9b0-30a1-13b9-559270f31264@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 17:58:52 +0000
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Jordy Zomer <jordy@...ing.systems>, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix use-after-free in io_wqe_inc_running() due to wq
already being free'd
On 15/03/2021 17:44, Jordy Zomer wrote:
> My syzkaller instance reported a use-after-free bug in io_wqe_inc_running.
> I tried fixing this by checking if wq isn't NULL in io_wqe_worker.
> If it does; return an -EFAULT. This because create_io_worker() will clean-up the worker if there's an error.
>
> If you want I could send you the syzkaller reproducer and crash-logs :)
Yes, please.
Haven't looked up properly, but looks that wq==NULL should
never happen, so the fix is a bit racy.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Jordy Zomer
>
> Signed-off-by: Jordy Zomer <jordy@...ing.systems>
> ---
> fs/io-wq.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
> index 0ae9ecadf295..9ed92d88a088 100644
> --- a/fs/io-wq.c
> +++ b/fs/io-wq.c
> @@ -482,6 +482,10 @@ static int io_wqe_worker(void *data)
> char buf[TASK_COMM_LEN];
>
> worker->flags |= (IO_WORKER_F_UP | IO_WORKER_F_RUNNING);
> +
> + if (wq == NULL)
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> io_wqe_inc_running(worker);
>
> sprintf(buf, "iou-wrk-%d", wq->task_pid);
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists