linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1328e64e-11c3-1391-e56d-97ee9b322f6d@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Mar 2021 14:01:28 -0500
From:   "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     broonie@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        jthierry@...hat.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace



On 3/15/21 11:57 AM, madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com wrote:
> Proper termination of the stack trace
> =====================================
> 
> In the unwinder, check the following for properly terminating the stack
> trace:
> 
> 	- Check every frame to see if it is task_pt_regs(stack)->stackframe.
> 	  If it is, terminate the stack trace successfully.
> 

There is a typo in the above sentence. task_pt_regs(stack)->stackframe
should be task_pt_regs(task)->stackframe.

Sorry about that.

Madhavan