linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: admin-guide: cgroup-v1: Fix typos in the file memory.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87im5s2q9a.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:03:45 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>, tj@...nel.org,
        lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     rdunlap@...radead.org, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: admin-guide: cgroup-v1: Fix typos in the file
 memory.rst

Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com> writes:

> s/overcommited/overcommitted/
> s/Overcommiting/Overcommitting/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst
> index 52688ae34461..0d574fd3f8e3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst
> @@ -360,8 +360,8 @@ U != 0, K = unlimited:
>
>  U != 0, K < U:
>      Kernel memory is a subset of the user memory. This setup is useful in
> -    deployments where the total amount of memory per-cgroup is overcommited.
> -    Overcommiting kernel memory limits is definitely not recommended, since the
> +    deployments where the total amount of memory per-cgroup is overcommitted.
> +    Overcommitting kernel memory limits is definitely not recommended, since the
>      box can still run out of non-reclaimable memory.

Applied, thanks.

jon