[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47b8a0a6-652e-8168-43c0-79dba382c4d6@kaspersky.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:49:51 +0300
From: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>,
Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@...zon.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@....net>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stsp2@...dex.ru" <stsp2@...dex.ru>,
"oxffffaa@...il.com" <oxffffaa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 06/22] af_vsock: implement send logic for SEQPACKET
On 12.03.2021 18:10, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 09:00:26PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>> This adds some logic to current stream enqueue function for SEQPACKET
>> support:
>> 1) Use transport's seqpacket enqueue callback.
>> 2) Return value from enqueue function is whole record length or error
>> for SOCK_SEQPACKET.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/af_vsock.h | 2 ++
>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>> index a8c4039e40cf..aed306292ab3 100644
>> --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
>> +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>> @@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ struct vsock_transport {
>> size_t (*seqpacket_seq_get_len)(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
>> int (*seqpacket_dequeue)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg,
>> int flags, bool *msg_ready);
>> + int (*seqpacket_enqueue)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg,
>> + int flags, size_t len);
>>
>> /* Notification. */
>> int (*notify_poll_in)(struct vsock_sock *, size_t, bool *);
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> index 5bf64a3e678a..a031f165494d 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> @@ -1830,9 +1830,14 @@ static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>> * responsibility to check how many bytes we were able to send.
>> */
>>
>> - written = transport->stream_enqueue(
>> - vsk, msg,
>> - len - total_written);
>> + if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) {
>> + written = transport->seqpacket_enqueue(vsk,
>> + msg, msg->msg_flags,
> I think we can avoid to pass 'msg->msg_flags', since the transport can
> access it through the 'msg' pointer, right?
Ack
>
>> + len - total_written);
>> + } else {
>> + written = transport->stream_enqueue(vsk,
>> + msg, len - total_written);
>> + }
>> if (written < 0) {
>> err = -ENOMEM;
>> goto out_err;
>> @@ -1844,12 +1849,17 @@ static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>> vsk, written, &send_data);
>> if (err < 0)
>> goto out_err;
>> -
>> }
>>
>> out_err:
>> - if (total_written > 0)
>> - err = total_written;
>> + if (total_written > 0) {
>> + /* Return number of written bytes only if:
>> + * 1) SOCK_STREAM socket.
>> + * 2) SOCK_SEQPACKET socket when whole buffer is sent.
>> + */
>> + if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM || total_written == len)
>> + err = total_written;
>> + }
>> out:
>> release_sock(sk);
>> return err;
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists