linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] docs: Group arch-specific documentation under "CPU Architectures"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87k0q819g1.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:52:14 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] docs: Group arch-specific documentation under "CPU
 Architectures"

Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net> writes:

> To declutter the top-level table of contents (the side bar), this
> patch reduces the architecture-specfic documentation to one top-level
> item, "CPU Architectures".
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
> ---
>
> As a side effect, the TOC in index.html effectively gets one level of
> detail less. This could be fixed by specifying ':maxdepth: 3'.
> ---
>  Documentation/arch.rst  | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  Documentation/index.rst | 20 ++------------------
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/arch.rst

I've badly wanted to clean up that page for a long time; this is a step
in that direction, so I'm happy to see it.  Applied, thanks.

And no, we need *less* detail on the front page, not more, so no need to
bring all that back.

Thanks,

jon