[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9047922808df340feca2f257cfb8a3d@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 08:30:52 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Shenming Lu <lushenming@...wei.com>
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com, yuzenghui@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Restore VLPI pending state to
physical side
On 2021-03-13 08:38, Shenming Lu wrote:
> From: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
>
> When setting the forwarding path of a VLPI (switch to the HW mode),
> we can also transfer the pending state from irq->pending_latch to
> VPT (especially in migration, the pending states of VLPIs are restored
> into kvm’s vgic first). And we currently send "INT+VSYNC" to trigger
> a VLPI to pending.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shenming Lu <lushenming@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
> b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
> index ac029ba3d337..3b82ab80c2f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
> @@ -449,6 +449,24 @@ int kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm,
> int virq,
> irq->host_irq = virq;
> atomic_inc(&map.vpe->vlpi_count);
>
> + /* Transfer pending state */
> + if (irq->pending_latch) {
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
> + IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
> + irq->pending_latch);
> + WARN_RATELIMIT(ret, "IRQ %d", irq->host_irq);
> +
> + /*
> + * Clear pending_latch and communicate this state
> + * change via vgic_queue_irq_unlock.
> + */
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
> + irq->pending_latch = false;
> + vgic_queue_irq_unlock(kvm, irq, flags);
> + }
> +
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock);
> return ret;
The read side of the pending state isn't locked, but the write side is.
I'd rather you lock the whole sequence for peace of mind.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists