[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c03f9a60-779c-6cdf-a16d-0309823ebc08@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:38:10 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>
To: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] ata: sata_highbank: delete redundant print and fix
return value
Hello!
On 15.03.2021 5:39, Wang Qing wrote:
> platform_get_irq() has already checked and printed the return value,
> the printing here is nothing special, and should corrected to < 0.
>
> Also, thhe return value should return a real error.
The.
It's a bad idea to mix the fix and cleanup in one patch (and to do two
things in one patch as well); also describing a bug fix as an "appendage"
to the clean up. Anyway, I had already posted the fix here:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=161575450917827
> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
> ---
> drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c b/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c
> index 64b2ef1..4438ee6
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c
> @@ -469,10 +469,8 @@ static int ahci_highbank_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (irq <= 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "no irq\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + if (irq < 0)
> + return irq;
What about irq == 0?
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists