[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af0db3d1-fd9e-37b5-c86c-b0f628e4fb97@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:47:11 +0800
From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Yao Jin <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
<mliska@...e.cz>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<zhangjinhao2@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] perf annotate: Fix sample events lost in stdio mode
Hi,
On 2021/3/13 11:06, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 11:16 AM Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com> wrote:
>>
>> In hist__find_annotations function, since different hist_entry may point to same
>> symbol, we free notes->src to signal already processed this symbol in stdio mode;
>> when annotate, entry will skipped if notes->src is NULL to avoid repeated output.
>>
>> However, there is a problem, for example, run the following command:
>>
>> # perf record -e branch-misses -e branch-instructions -a sleep 1
>>
>> perf.data file contains different types of sample event.
>>
>> If the same IP sample event exists in branch-misses and branch-instructions,
>> this event uses the same symbol. When annotate branch-misses events, notes->src
>> corresponding to this event is set to null, as a result, when annotate
>> branch-instructions events, this event is skipped and no annotate is output.
>>
>> Solution of this patch is to remove zfree in hists__find_annotations and
>> change sort order to "dso,symbol" to avoid duplicate output when different
>> processes correspond to the same symbol.
>
> Looks good. But I'm not sure about the branch stack mode.
> I suspect we can use the same sort key there.
>
> Jin Yao, what do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
Is it changed to the following?
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
@@ -374,13 +374,6 @@ static void hists__find_annotations(struct hists
*hists,
} else {
hist_entry__tty_annotate(he, evsel, ann);
nd = rb_next(nd);
- /*
- * Since we have a hist_entry per IP for the same
- * symbol, free he->ms.sym->src to signal we already
- * processed this symbol.
- */
- zfree(¬es->src->cycles_hist);
- zfree(¬es->src);
}
}
}
@@ -619,6 +612,12 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv)
setup_browser(true);
+ /*
+ * Events of different processes may correspond to the same
+ * symbol, we do not care about the processes in annotate,
+ * set sort order to avoid repeated output.
+ */
+ sort_order = "dso,symbol";
if ((use_browser == 1 || annotate.use_stdio2) &&
annotate.has_br_stack) {
sort__mode = SORT_MODE__BRANCH;
if (setup_sorting(annotate.session->evlist) < 0)
I think branch stack mode also don't care about the processes.
>> ---
>> tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c | 13 ++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
>> index a23ba6bb99b6..ad169e3e2e8f 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
>> @@ -374,13 +374,6 @@ static void hists__find_annotations(struct hists *hists,
>> } else {
>> hist_entry__tty_annotate(he, evsel, ann);
>> nd = rb_next(nd);
>> - /*
>> - * Since we have a hist_entry per IP for the same
>> - * symbol, free he->ms.sym->src to signal we already
>> - * processed this symbol.
>> - */
>> - zfree(¬es->src->cycles_hist);
>> - zfree(¬es->src);
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -624,6 +617,12 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv)
>> if (setup_sorting(annotate.session->evlist) < 0)
>> usage_with_options(annotate_usage, options);
>> } else {
>> + /*
>> + * Events of different processes may correspond to the same
>> + * symbol, we do not care about the processes in annotate,
>> + * set sort order to avoid repeated output.
>> + */
>> + sort_order = "dso,symbol";
>> if (setup_sorting(NULL) < 0)
>> usage_with_options(annotate_usage, options);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.30.GIT
>>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists