[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegsb9XrUct5zawN+kS_DSfowBf2BnrZzG+cQXUvsGZZuow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 14:14:35 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] vfs: Use an xarray instead of inserted bookmarks
to scan mount list
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 1:07 PM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Al, Miklós,
>
> Can we consider replacing the "insert cursor" approach we're currently
> using for proc files to scan the current namespace's mount list[1] with
> something that uses an xarray of mounts indexed by mnt_id?
>
> This has some advantages:
>
> (1) It's simpler. We don't need to insert dummy mount objects as
> bookmarks into the mount list and code that's walking the list doesn't
> have to carefully step over them.
>
> (2) We can use the file position to represent the mnt_id and can jump to
> it directly - ie. using seek() to jump to a mount object by its ID.
What happens if the mount at the current position is removed?
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists