| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <abe764db9c4b418fa5293feeff61f56a@hisilicon.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 03:11:06 +0000
From: "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
To: "tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"dietmar.eggemann@....com" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"bsegall@...gle.com" <bsegall@...gle.com>,
"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
CC: "msys.mizuma@...il.com" <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
"valentin.schneider@....com" <valentin.schneider@....com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
"juri.lelli@...hat.com" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"sudeep.holla@....com" <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@...wei.com>,
"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>,
"guodong.xu@...aro.org" <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
yangyicong <yangyicong@...wei.com>,
"Liguozhu (Kenneth)" <liguozhu@...ilicon.com>,
"linuxarm@...neuler.org" <linuxarm@...neuler.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within a
die.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 12:00 PM
> To: tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com; catalin.marinas@....com; will@...nel.org;
> rjw@...ysocki.net; vincent.guittot@...aro.org; bp@...en8.de;
> tglx@...utronix.de; mingo@...hat.com; lenb@...nel.org; peterz@...radead.org;
> dietmar.eggemann@....com; rostedt@...dmis.org; bsegall@...gle.com;
> mgorman@...e.de
> Cc: msys.mizuma@...il.com; valentin.schneider@....com;
> gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>;
> juri.lelli@...hat.com; mark.rutland@....com; sudeep.holla@....com;
> aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org; x86@...nel.org;
> xuwei (O) <xuwei5@...wei.com>; Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>;
> guodong.xu@...aro.org; yangyicong <yangyicong@...wei.com>; Liguozhu (Kenneth)
> <liguozhu@...ilicon.com>; linuxarm@...neuler.org; hpa@...or.com; Jonathan
> Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>; Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
> <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
> Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within a die.
>
> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
>
> Both ACPI and DT provide the ability to describe additional layers of
> topology between that of individual cores and higher level constructs
> such as the level at which the last level cache is shared.
> In ACPI this can be represented in PPTT as a Processor Hierarchy
> Node Structure [1] that is the parent of the CPU cores and in turn
> has a parent Processor Hierarchy Nodes Structure representing
> a higher level of topology.
>
> For example Kunpeng 920 has 6 or 8 clusters in each NUMA node, and each
> cluster has 4 cpus. All clusters share L3 cache data, but each cluster
> has local L3 tag. On the other hand, each clusters will share some
> internal system bus.
>
> +-----------------------------------+ +---------+
> | +------+ +------+ +---------------------------+ |
> | | CPU0 | | cpu1 | | +-----------+ | |
> | +------+ +------+ | | | | |
> | +----+ L3 | | |
> | +------+ +------+ cluster | | tag | | |
> | | CPU2 | | CPU3 | | | | | |
> | +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | |
> | | | |
> +-----------------------------------+ | |
> +-----------------------------------+ | |
> | +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ |
> | | | | | | +-----------+ | |
> | +------+ +------+ | | | | |
> | | | L3 | | |
> | +------+ +------+ +----+ tag | | |
> | | | | | | | | | |
> | +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | |
> | | | |
> +-----------------------------------+ | L3 |
> | data |
> +-----------------------------------+ | |
> | +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | |
> | | | | | | | | | |
> | +------+ +------+ +----+ L3 | | |
> | | | tag | | |
> | +------+ +------+ | | | | |
> | | | | | ++ +-----------+ | |
> | +------+ +------+ |---------------------------+ |
> +-----------------------------------| | |
> +-----------------------------------| | |
> | +------+ +------+ +---------------------------+ |
> | | | | | | +-----------+ | |
> | +------+ +------+ | | | | |
> | +----+ L3 | | |
> | +------+ +------+ | | tag | | |
> | | | | | | | | | |
> | +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | |
> | | | |
> +-----------------------------------+ | |
> +-----------------------------------+ | |
> | +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ |
> | | | | | | +-----------+ | |
> | +------+ +------+ | | | | |
> | | | L3 | | |
> | +------+ +------+ +---+ tag | | |
> | | | | | | | | | |
> | +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | |
> | | | |
> +-----------------------------------+ | |
> +-----------------------------------+ ++ |
> | +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ |
> | | | | | | +-----------+ | |
> | +------+ +------+ | | | | |
> | | | L3 | | |
> | +------+ +------+ +--+ tag | | |
> | | | | | | | | | |
> | +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | |
> | | +---------+
> +-----------------------------------+
>
> That means the cost to transfer ownership of a cacheline between CPUs
> within a cluster is lower than between CPUs in different clusters on
> the same die. Hence, it can make sense to tell the scheduler to use
> the cache affinity of the cluster to make better decision on thread
> migration.
>
> This patch simply exposes this information to userspace libraries
> like hwloc by providing cluster_cpus and related sysfs attributes.
> PoC of HWLOC support at [2].
>
> Note this patch only handle the ACPI case.
>
> Special consideration is needed for SMT processors, where it is
> necessary to move 2 levels up the hierarchy from the leaf nodes
> (thus skipping the processor core level).
>
> Currently the ID provided is the offset of the Processor
> Hierarchy Nodes Structure within PPTT. Whilst this is unique
> it is not terribly elegant so alternative suggestions welcome.
>
> Note that arm64 / ACPI does not provide any means of identifying
> a die level in the topology but that may be unrelate to the cluster
> level.
>
> [1] ACPI Specification 6.3 - section 5.2.29.1 processor hierarchy node
> structure (Type 0)
> [2] https://github.com/hisilicon/hwloc/tree/linux-cluster
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
> ---
> -v4:
> * used acpi_cpu_id for acpi_find_processor_node(addressing Masa's comment)
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/cputopology.rst | 26 +++++++++++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 2 +
> drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 14 +++++++
> drivers/base/topology.c | 10 +++++
> include/linux/acpi.h | 5 +++
> include/linux/arch_topology.h | 5 +++
> include/linux/topology.h | 6 +++
> 8 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cputopology.rst
> b/Documentation/admin-guide/cputopology.rst
> index b90dafc..f9d3745 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cputopology.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cputopology.rst
> @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@ core_id:
> identifier (rather than the kernel's). The actual value is
> architecture and platform dependent.
>
> +cluster_id:
> +
> + the Cluster ID of cpuX. Typically it is the hardware platform's
> + identifier (rather than the kernel's). The actual value is
> + architecture and platform dependent.
> +
> book_id:
>
> the book ID of cpuX. Typically it is the hardware platform's
> @@ -56,6 +62,14 @@ package_cpus_list:
> human-readable list of CPUs sharing the same physical_package_id.
> (deprecated name: "core_siblings_list")
>
> +cluster_cpus:
> +
> + internal kernel map of CPUs within the same cluster.
> +
> +cluster_cpus_list:
> +
> + human-readable list of CPUs within the same cluster.
> +
> die_cpus:
>
> internal kernel map of CPUs within the same die.
> @@ -96,11 +110,13 @@ these macros in include/asm-XXX/topology.h::
>
> #define topology_physical_package_id(cpu)
> #define topology_die_id(cpu)
> + #define topology_cluster_id(cpu)
> #define topology_core_id(cpu)
> #define topology_book_id(cpu)
> #define topology_drawer_id(cpu)
> #define topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)
> #define topology_core_cpumask(cpu)
> + #define topology_cluster_cpumask(cpu)
> #define topology_die_cpumask(cpu)
> #define topology_book_cpumask(cpu)
> #define topology_drawer_cpumask(cpu)
> @@ -116,10 +132,12 @@ not defined by include/asm-XXX/topology.h:
>
> 1) topology_physical_package_id: -1
> 2) topology_die_id: -1
> -3) topology_core_id: 0
> -4) topology_sibling_cpumask: just the given CPU
> -5) topology_core_cpumask: just the given CPU
> -6) topology_die_cpumask: just the given CPU
> +3) topology_cluster_id: -1
> +4) topology_core_id: 0
> +5) topology_sibling_cpumask: just the given CPU
> +6) topology_core_cpumask: just the given CPU
> +7) topology_cluster_cpumask: just the given CPU
> +8) topology_die_cpumask: just the given CPU
>
> For architectures that don't support books (CONFIG_SCHED_BOOK) there are no
> default definitions for topology_book_id() and topology_book_cpumask().
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index f6faa69..fe076b3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
> cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = -1;
> cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = topology_id;
> }
> + topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_cluster(cpu);
> + cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = topology_id;
> topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(cpu);
> cpu_topology[cpu].package_id = topology_id;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> index 4ae9335..11f8b02 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> @@ -737,6 +737,69 @@ int find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(unsigned int cpu)
> }
>
> /**
> + * find_acpi_cpu_topology_cluster() - Determine a unique CPU cluster value
> + * @cpu: Kernel logical CPU number
> + *
> + * Determine a topology unique cluster ID for the given CPU/thread.
> + * This ID can then be used to group peers, which will have matching ids.
> + *
> + * The cluster, if present is the level of topology above CPUs. In a
> + * multi-thread CPU, it will be the level above the CPU, not the thread.
> + * It may not exist in single CPU systems. In simple multi-CPU systems,
> + * it may be equal to the package topology level.
> + *
> + * Return: -ENOENT if the PPTT doesn't exist, the CPU cannot be found
> + * or there is no toplogy level above the CPU..
> + * Otherwise returns a value which represents the package for this CPU.
> + */
> +
> +int find_acpi_cpu_topology_cluster(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + struct acpi_table_header *table;
> + acpi_status status;
> + struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node, *cluster_node;
> + u32 acpi_cpu_id;
> + int retval;
> + int is_thread;
> +
> + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + acpi_cpu_id = get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu);
> + cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table, acpi_cpu_id);
> + if (cpu_node == NULL || !cpu_node->parent) {
> + retval = -ENOENT;
> + goto put_table;
> + }
> +
> + is_thread = cpu_node->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IS_THREAD;
> + cluster_node = fetch_pptt_node(table, cpu_node->parent);
> + if (cluster_node == NULL) {
> + retval = -ENOENT;
> + goto put_table;
> + }
> + if (is_thread) {
> + if (!cluster_node->parent) {
> + retval = -ENOENT;
> + goto put_table;
> + }
> + cluster_node = fetch_pptt_node(table, cluster_node->parent);
> + if (cluster_node == NULL) {
> + retval = -ENOENT;
> + goto put_table;
> + }
> + }
> + retval = ACPI_PTR_DIFF(cluster_node, table);
> +put_table:
> + acpi_put_table(table);
> +
> + return retval;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id() - Get a core architecture tag
> * @cpu: Kernel logical CPU number
> *
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index de8587c..3079232 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -506,6 +506,11 @@ const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
> return core_mask;
> }
>
> +const struct cpumask *cpu_clustergroup_mask(int cpu)
> +{
> + return &cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_sibling;
> +}
> +
> void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
> {
> struct cpu_topology *cpu_topo, *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
> @@ -523,6 +528,11 @@ void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
> if (cpuid_topo->package_id != cpu_topo->package_id)
> continue;
>
> + if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id == cpu_topo->cluster_id) {
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpuid_topo->cluster_sibling);
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->cluster_sibling);
> + }
> +
I am seeing a machine without cluster is getting cluster,
so I guess we need the below:
diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
index 3079232ed8ed..ccd4b3b5cc6f 100644
--- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
@@ -528,7 +528,8 @@ void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
if (cpuid_topo->package_id != cpu_topo->package_id)
continue;
- if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id == cpu_topo->cluster_id) {
+ if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id == cpu_topo->cluster_id &&
+ cpu_topo->cluster_id != -1) {
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpuid_topo->cluster_sibling);
cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->cluster_sibling);
}
@@ -568,6 +569,7 @@ void __init reset_cpu_topology(void)
struct cpu_topology *cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu];
cpu_topo->thread_id = -1;
+ cpu_topo->cluster_id = -1;
cpu_topo->core_id = -1;
cpu_topo->package_id = -1;
cpu_topo->llc_id = -1;
Hi Jonathan, thoughts?
Thanks
Barry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists