[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ9a7VibrGHh_AU1gOJtbbi9Sq_fWXaAc8nsdvo3z8LGK3e9Hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:00:05 +0000
From: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Coresight ML <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Yabin Cui <yabinc@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Tingwei Zhang <tingwei@...eaurora.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] coresight: syscfg: Add registration and feature
loading for cs devices
Hi Suzuki
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 10:33, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike
>
> There are some minor comments on the naming scheme of the structures,
> which I think might improve the code readability.
>
> e.g, in general anything that is associated with a csdev could be named
> as such csdev_*, rather than cscfg_*_csdev. The latter kind of implies
> "cscfg" is the "primary" object, while it is the csdev where we track
> this.
>
> Feel free to ignore.
>
> On 1/28/21 5:09 PM, Mike Leach wrote:
> > API for individual devices to register with the syscfg management
> > system is added.
> >
> > Devices register with matching information, and any features or
> > configurations that match will be loaded into the device.
> >
> > The feature and configuration loading is extended so that on load these
> > are loaded into any currently registered devices. This allows
> > configuration loading after devices have been registered.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-config.h | 98 +++++
> > .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c | 348 ++++++++++++++++++
> > .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.h | 20 +
> > include/linux/coresight.h | 5 +
> > 4 files changed, 471 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-config.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-config.h
> > index 3fedf8ab3cee..75ecdecf7013 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-config.h
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-config.h
> > @@ -164,4 +164,102 @@ struct cscfg_config_desc {
> > const u64 *presets; /* nr_presets * nr_total_params */
> > };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * config register instance - part of a loaded feature.
> > + * maps register values to csdev driver structures
> > + *
> > + * @value: value to use when setting feature on device / store for
> > + * readback of volatile values.
> > + * @drv_store: pointer to internal driver element used to set the value
> > + * in hardware.
> > + */
> > +struct cscfg_reg_csdev {
>
> minor nit: csdev_csfg_reg ?
>
> > + struct cscfg_regval_desc value;
> > + void *drv_store;
> > +};
>
> I am not sure if it helps to move this drv_store field into csfg_regval_desc
> as "void *private". I haven't looked at the following patches. That way we
> have less number of structures to deal with.
>
drv_store is a per csdev instance value accessing per device data - so
cannot be part of the single registerregval_desc descriptor in the
feature desc.
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * config parameter instance - part of a loaded feature.
> > + *
> > + * @feat: parent feature
> > + * @reg: register value updated by this parameter.
> > + * @current_value: current value of parameter - may be set by user via
> > + * sysfs, or modified during device operation.
> > + * @val64: true if 64 bit value
> > + */
> > +struct cscfg_parameter_csdev {
>
> nit: cscdev_cfg_parameter ?
>
> > + struct cscfg_feature_csdev *feat;
>
> nit: s/feat/cscfg_feat ?
>
> > + struct cscfg_reg_csdev *reg;
>
> nit: s/reg/cscfg_reg/ ?
>
> > + u64 current_value;
> > + bool val64;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * Feature instance loaded into a CoreSight device.
> > + *
> > + * When a feature is loaded into a specific device, then this structure holds
> > + * the connections between the register / parameter values used and the
> > + * internal data structures that are written when the feature is enabled.
> > + *
> > + * Since applying a feature modifies internal data structures in the device,
> > + * then we have a reference to the device spinlock to protect access to these
> > + * structures (@csdev_spinlock).
> > + *
> > + * @desc: pointer to the static descriptor for this feature.
> > + * @csdev: parent CoreSight device instance.
> > + * @node: list entry into feature list for this device.
> > + * @csdev_spinlock: device spinlock from csdev instance..
> > + * @nr_params: number of parameters.
> > + * @params: current parameter values on this device
> > + * @nr_regs: number of registers to be programmed.
> > + * @regs: Programming details for the registers
> > + */
> > +struct cscfg_feature_csdev {
> > + const struct cscfg_feature_desc *desc;
>
> nit: s/desc/cscfg_feat_desc ?
>
> > + struct coresight_device *csdev;
> > + struct list_head node;
> > + spinlock_t *csdev_spinlock;
>
> Why do we need this explicitly here when we have access to csdev ?
>
> > + int nr_params;
> > + struct cscfg_parameter_csdev *params;
>
> nit: s/params/cscfg_params/ ?
>
> > + int nr_regs;
> > + struct cscfg_reg_csdev *regs;
>
> nit: cscfg_regs ?
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * Configuration instance when loaded into a CoreSight device.
> > + *
> > + * The instance contains references to loaded features on this device that are
> > + * used by the configuration.
> > + *
> > + * @desc: reference to the descriptor for this configuration
> > + * @csdev: parent coresight device for this configuration instance.
> > + * @node: list entry within the coresight device
> > + * @nr_feat: Number of features on this device that are used in the
> > + * configuration.
> > + * @feats: reference to the device features to enable.
> > + * @enabled: true if configuration is enabled on this device.
> > + */
> > +struct cscfg_config_csdev {
>
> nit: csdev_cscfg_config ?
>
> > + const struct cscfg_config_desc *desc;
> > + struct coresight_device *csdev;
> > + struct list_head node;
> > + int nr_feat;
> > + struct cscfg_feature_csdev **feats;
> > + bool enabled;
> > +};
>
> If you rearrange the fields a bit like below, you could optimize the
> allocations:
>
> struct cscfg_config_csdev {
> bool enabled;
> > + const struct cscfg_config_desc *desc;
> > + struct coresight_device *csdev;
> > + struct list_head node;
> int nr_feat;
> struct cscfg_feature_csdev *cscfg_feats[0]
> };
>
> cscfg_config = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> offsetof(struct cscfg_config_csdev, cscfg_feats[nr_feat]),
> GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Instead of additional allocation for the array below.
>
OK.
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * Coresight device operations.
> > + *
> > + * Registered coresight devices provide these operations to manage feature
> > + * instances compatible with the device hardware and drivers
> > + *
> > + * @load_feat: Pass a feature descriptor into the device and create the
> > + * loaded feature instance (struct cscfg_feature_csdev).
> > + */
> > +struct cscfg_csdev_feat_ops {
> > + int (*load_feat)(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> > + struct cscfg_feature_csdev *feat);
> > +};
> > +
> > #endif /* _CORESIGHT_CORESIGHT_CONFIG_H */
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c
> > index f7e396a5f9cb..c04cea0c1db2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c
> > @@ -25,6 +25,212 @@ static struct cscfg_manager *cscfg_mgr;
> >
> > /* load features and configuations into the lists */
> >
> > +/* protect the cfg lists in the csdev instances */
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(cscfg_csdev_mutex);
> > +
> > +/* get name feature instance from a coresight device list of features */
> > +static struct cscfg_feature_csdev *
> > +cscfg_get_feat_csdev(struct coresight_device *csdev, const char *name)
> > +{
> > + struct cscfg_feature_csdev *feat = NULL;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(feat, &csdev->feature_csdev_list, node) {
> > + if (strcmp(feat->desc->name, name) == 0)
> > + return feat;
> > + }
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* allocate the device config instance - with max number of used features */
> > +static struct cscfg_config_csdev *
> > +cscfg_alloc_csdev_cfg(struct coresight_device *csdev, int nr_feats)
> > +{
> > + struct cscfg_config_csdev *dev_cfg = NULL;
> > + struct device *dev = csdev->dev.parent;
> > +
> > + /* this is being allocated using the devm for the coresight device */
> > + dev_cfg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct cscfg_config_csdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!dev_cfg)
> > + return NULL;
>
> Please see my comment above struct field re-organization and ease of allocation above.
> > +
> > + dev_cfg->csdev = csdev;
> > + dev_cfg->feats = devm_kcalloc(dev, nr_feats,
> > + sizeof(struct cscfg_feature_csdev *),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!dev_cfg->feats)
> > + dev_cfg = NULL;
> > + return dev_cfg;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* check match info between used feature from the config and a regisered device */
> > +static bool cscfg_match_feat_info(struct cscfg_match_desc *used_cmp,
>
> minor nit: s/used_cmp/feat_match ?
>
> > + struct cscfg_match_desc *reg_dev)
>
> s/reg_dev/
> > +{
> > + /* if flags don't match then fail early */
> > + if (!(used_cmp->match_flags & reg_dev->match_flags))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Load a config into a device if there are feature matches between config and device */
> > +static int cscfg_add_csdev_cfg(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> > + struct cscfg_match_desc *match_info,
> > + struct cscfg_config_desc *cfg_desc)
>
> Why not pass struct cscfg_csdev_register * instead of the first two parameters ?
> That way, it is easier to follow what we do here too.
>
> > +{
> > + struct cscfg_config_csdev *dev_cfg = NULL;
> > + struct cscfg_config_feat_ref *feat_ref;
> > + struct cscfg_feature_csdev *feat;
> > + int checked;
>
> super minor nit: s/checked/i ?
>
> > +
> > + /* look at each required feature and see if it matches any feature on the device */
> > + for (checked = 0; checked < cfg_desc->nr_refs; checked++) {
> > + feat_ref = &cfg_desc->refs[checked];
> > + if (cscfg_match_feat_info(&feat_ref->match, match_info)) {
> > + /* device matched - get the feature */
> > + feat = cscfg_get_feat_csdev(csdev, feat_ref->name);
> > + if (!feat)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + if (!dev_cfg) {
> > + dev_cfg = cscfg_alloc_csdev_cfg(csdev, cfg_desc->nr_refs);
> > + if (!dev_cfg)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + dev_cfg->desc = cfg_desc;
> > + }
> > + dev_cfg->feats[dev_cfg->nr_feat++] = feat;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> I understand we don't have dynamic unloading of the features yet, but it would
> be good to do the above step with the mutex held to protect us when we add the
> unloading, to prevent a config deleted while we are adding it here.
>
The cscfg_csdev_mutex protects the csdev loaded config instance lists,
in order to prevent another config / feature being added while the
csdev is being enabled / disabled and enabling or disabling a config.
It will not be possible to remove a config at the same time as we are
adding one, as the dyn loading will preclude adding and removing at
the same time using the cscfg_mutex, which protects the descriptor
lists in the cscfg_manager.
Adding configs will be permitted while other configs are active,
removing them will only ever occur when nothing is active (otherwise
there is a world of dependency related pain).
> > + /* if matched features, add config to device.*/
> > + if (dev_cfg) {
> > + mutex_lock(&cscfg_csdev_mutex);
> > + list_add(&dev_cfg->node, &csdev->config_csdev_list);
> > + mutex_unlock(&cscfg_csdev_mutex);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Add the config to the set of registered devices - call with mutex locked.
> > + * Iterates through devices - any device that matches one or more of the
> > + * configuration features will load it, the others will ignore it.
> > + */
> > +static int cscfg_add_cfg_to_csdevs(struct cscfg_config_desc *cfg_desc)
> > +{
> > + struct cscfg_csdev_register *curr_item;
>
> minor nit: s/curr_item/csdev_reg
>
OK.
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(curr_item, &cscfg_mgr->data.csdev_desc_list, item) {
> > + err = cscfg_add_csdev_cfg(curr_item->csdev, &curr_item->match_info, cfg_desc);
>
> Could we not make this
>
> err = cscfg_add_csdev_cfg(cscfg_csdev, cfg_desc); ?
>
> Which easily implies, load cfg_desc to a csdev.
>
>
This has been re-written / simplified
>
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Allocate a feature object for load into a csdev.
> > + * memory allocated using the csdev->dev object using devm managed allocator.
> > + */
> > +static struct cscfg_feature_csdev *
> > +cscfg_alloc_csdev_feat(struct coresight_device *csdev, struct cscfg_feature_desc *feat_desc)
> > +{
> > + struct cscfg_feature_csdev *feat = NULL;
> > + struct device *dev = csdev->dev.parent;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + feat = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct cscfg_feature_csdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!feat)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + /* parameters are optional - could be 0 */
> > + feat->nr_params = feat_desc->nr_params;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * if we need parameters, zero alloc the space here, the load routine in
> > + * the csdev device driver will fill out some information according to
> > + * feature descriptor.
> > + */
> > + if (feat->nr_params) {
> > + feat->params = devm_kcalloc(dev, feat->nr_params,
> > + sizeof(struct cscfg_parameter_csdev),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!feat->params)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * fill in the feature reference in the param - other fields
> > + * handled by loader in csdev.
> > + */
> > + for (i = 0; i < feat->nr_params; i++)
> > + feat->params[i].feat = feat;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Always have registers to program - again the load routine in csdev device
> > + * will fill out according to feature descriptor and device requirements.
> > + */
> > + feat->nr_regs = feat_desc->nr_regs;
> > + feat->regs = devm_kcalloc(dev, feat->nr_regs,
> > + sizeof(struct cscfg_reg_csdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!feat->regs)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + /* load the feature default values */
> > + feat->desc = feat_desc;
> > + feat->csdev = csdev;
> > +
> > + return feat;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* load one feature into one coresight device */
> > +static int cscfg_load_feat_csdev(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> > + struct cscfg_feature_desc *feat_desc,
> > + struct cscfg_csdev_feat_ops *ops)
> > +{
> > + struct cscfg_feature_csdev *feat_csdev;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + if (!ops->load_feat)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + feat_csdev = cscfg_alloc_csdev_feat(csdev, feat_desc);
> > + if (!feat_csdev)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + /* load the feature into the device - may modify default ops*/
> > + err = ops->load_feat(csdev, feat_csdev);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + /* add to internal csdev feature list */
> > + mutex_lock(&cscfg_csdev_mutex);
> > + list_add(&feat_csdev->node, &csdev->feature_csdev_list);
> > + mutex_unlock(&cscfg_csdev_mutex);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Add feature to any matching devices - call with mutex locked.
> > + * Iterates through devices - any device that matches the feature will be
> > + * called to load it.
> > + */
> > +static int cscfg_add_feat_to_csdevs(struct cscfg_feature_desc *feat_desc)
> > +{
> > + struct cscfg_csdev_register *curr_item;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(curr_item, &cscfg_mgr->data.csdev_desc_list, item) {
> > + if (curr_item->match_info.match_flags & feat_desc->match_flags) {
> > + err = cscfg_load_feat_csdev(curr_item->csdev, feat_desc, &curr_item->ops);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* check feature list for a named feature - call with mutex locked. */
> > static bool cscfg_match_list_feat(const char *name)
> > {
> > @@ -53,6 +259,13 @@ static int cscfg_check_feat_for_cfg(struct cscfg_config_desc *cfg_desc)
> > */
> > static int cscfg_load_feat(struct cscfg_feature_desc *feat_desc)
> > {
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + /* add feature to any matching registered devices */
> > + err = cscfg_add_feat_to_csdevs(feat_desc);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > list_add(&feat_desc->item, &cscfg_mgr->data.feat_desc_list);
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -71,6 +284,11 @@ static int cscfg_load_config(struct cscfg_config_desc *cfg_desc)
> > if (err)
> > return err;
> >
> > + /* add config to any matching registered device */
> > + err = cscfg_add_cfg_to_csdevs(cfg_desc);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > list_add(&cfg_desc->item, &cscfg_mgr->data.config_desc_list);
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -122,6 +340,136 @@ int cscfg_load_config_sets(struct cscfg_config_desc **cfg_descs,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cscfg_load_config_sets);
> >
> > +/* Handle coresight device registration and add configs and features to devices */
> > +
> > +/* iterate through config lists and load matching configs to device */
> > +static int cscfg_add_cfgs_csdev(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> > + struct cscfg_match_desc *info)
> > +{
> > + struct cscfg_config_desc *curr_item;
> > + int err = 0;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(curr_item, &cscfg_mgr->data.config_desc_list, item) {
> > + err = cscfg_add_csdev_cfg(csdev, info, curr_item);
> > + if (err)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* iterate through feature lists and load matching features to device */
> > +static int cscfg_add_feats_csdev(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> > + struct cscfg_match_desc *info,
> > + struct cscfg_csdev_feat_ops *ops)
> > +{
> > + struct cscfg_feature_desc *curr_item;
> > + int err = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!ops->load_feat)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(curr_item, &cscfg_mgr->data.feat_desc_list, item) {
> > + if (curr_item->match_flags & info->match_flags) {
> > + err = cscfg_load_feat_csdev(csdev, curr_item, ops);
> > + if (err)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Add coresight device to list and copy its matching info */
> > +static int cscfg_list_add_csdev(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> > + struct cscfg_match_desc *info,
> > + struct cscfg_csdev_feat_ops *ops)
> > +{
> > + struct cscfg_csdev_register *list_entry;
> > +
> > + /* allocate the list entry structure */
> > + list_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cscfg_csdev_register), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!list_entry)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + list_entry->csdev = csdev;
> > + list_entry->match_info.match_flags = info->match_flags;
> > + list_entry->ops.load_feat = ops->load_feat;
> > + list_add(&list_entry->item, &cscfg_mgr->data.csdev_desc_list);
> > +
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&csdev->feature_csdev_list);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&csdev->config_csdev_list);
> > + cscfg_mgr->data.nr_csdev++;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* remove a coresight device from the list and free data */
> > +static void cscfg_list_remove_csdev(struct coresight_device *csdev)
> > +{
> > + struct cscfg_csdev_register *curr_item, *tmp;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(curr_item, tmp, &cscfg_mgr->data.csdev_desc_list, item) {
> > + if (curr_item->csdev == csdev) {
> > + list_del(&curr_item->item);
> > + kfree(curr_item);
> > + cscfg_mgr->data.nr_csdev--;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* register a coresight device with the syscfg api */
> > +int cscfg_register_csdev(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> > + struct cscfg_match_desc *info,
> > + struct cscfg_csdev_feat_ops *ops)
> > +{
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&cscfg_mutex);
> > +
> > + /* add device to list of registered devices */
> > + ret = cscfg_list_add_csdev(csdev, info, ops);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto reg_csdev_unlock;
> > +
> > + /* now load any registered features and configs matching the device. */
> > + ret = cscfg_add_feats_csdev(csdev, info, ops);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + cscfg_list_remove_csdev(csdev);
> > + goto reg_csdev_unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = cscfg_add_cfgs_csdev(csdev, info);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + cscfg_list_remove_csdev(csdev);
> > + goto reg_csdev_unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pr_info("CSCFG registered %s", dev_name(&csdev->dev));
> > +
> > +reg_csdev_unlock:
> > + mutex_unlock(&cscfg_mutex);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cscfg_register_csdev);
> > +
> > +/* remove coresight device and update counts - syscfg device at 0 */
> > +void cscfg_unregister_csdev(struct coresight_device *csdev)
> > +{
> > + struct cscfg_csdev_register *curr_item, *tmp;
>
> s/curr_item/cscfg_csdev/ or something similar. Using generic names
> makes the field dereferencing bit suspicious.
>
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&cscfg_mutex);
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(curr_item, tmp, &cscfg_mgr->data.csdev_desc_list, item) {
> > + if (curr_item->csdev == csdev) {
> > + list_del(&curr_item->item);
> > + kfree(curr_item);
> > + cscfg_mgr->data.nr_csdev--;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + mutex_unlock(&cscfg_mutex);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cscfg_unregister_csdev);
> > +
> > /* Initialise system configuration management device. */
> >
> > struct device *to_device_cscfg(void)
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.h
> > index 907ba8d3efea..ebf5e1491d86 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.h
> > @@ -26,6 +26,22 @@ struct cscfg_api_data {
> > int nr_csdev;
> > };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * List entry for Coresight devices that are registered as supporting complex
> > + * config operations.
> > + *
> > + * @csdev: The registered device.
> > + * @match_info: The matching type information.
> > + * @ops: Operations supported by the registered device.
> > + * @item: list entry.
> > + */
> > +struct cscfg_csdev_register {
> > + struct coresight_device *csdev;
> > + struct cscfg_match_desc match_info;
> > + struct cscfg_csdev_feat_ops ops;
> > + struct list_head item;
> > +};
>
> If a device is only registered once :
>
> Could we inline this struct into the coresight_device removing
> the csdev ? We should be able to use container_of() to get to the
> coresight_device from the "item" and then get to the match_info
> and feat_ops.
>
> That might simplify the code a little bit, in terms of the
> number of different structures that we keep track of and
> makes it easier to follow the code.
>
I think that just moves some extra fields we need to keep track of
into a different structure.
I like to keep the cscfg related stuff together where possible.
>
> > +
> > /* internal core operations for cscfg */
> > int __init cscfg_init(void);
> > void __exit cscfg_exit(void);
> > @@ -33,6 +49,10 @@ void __exit cscfg_exit(void);
> > /* syscfg manager external API */
> > int cscfg_load_config_sets(struct cscfg_config_desc **cfg_descs,
> > struct cscfg_feature_desc **feat_descs);
> > +int cscfg_register_csdev(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> > + struct cscfg_match_desc *info,
> > + struct cscfg_csdev_feat_ops *ops);
>
> Yet to see how this will be invoked, but I feel like the csdev
> might be all you need here. I will look at the following patches.
>
> > +void cscfg_unregister_csdev(struct coresight_device *csdev);
> >
> > /**
> > * System configuration manager device.
> > diff --git a/include/linux/coresight.h b/include/linux/coresight.h
> > index 976ec2697610..d0126ed326a6 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/coresight.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/coresight.h
> > @@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ struct coresight_sysfs_link {
> > * @nr_links: number of sysfs links created to other components from this
> > * device. These will appear in the "connections" group.
> > * @has_conns_grp: Have added a "connections" group for sysfs links.
> > + * @feature_csdev_list: List of complex feature programming added to the device.
> > + * @config_csdev_list: List of system configurations added to the device.
> > */
> > struct coresight_device {
> > struct coresight_platform_data *pdata;
> > @@ -240,6 +242,9 @@ struct coresight_device {
> > int nr_links;
> > bool has_conns_grp;
> > bool ect_enabled; /* true only if associated ect device is enabled */
> > + /* system configuration and feature lists */
> > + struct list_head feature_csdev_list;
> > + struct list_head config_csdev_list;
> > };
>
> >
> > /*
> >
>
Thnaks and regards
Mike
--
Mike Leach
Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd.
Manchester Design Centre. UK
Powered by blists - more mailing lists