[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9da6397f-326b-7891-5810-a5ac9e0def5d@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:01:08 -0700
From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v23 6/9] x86/entry: Introduce ENDBR macro
On 3/16/2021 1:26 PM, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
> On 3/16/2021 1:15 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:05:30PM -0700, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
>>> On 3/16/2021 12:57 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:12:39AM -0700, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
>>>>> Alternatively, there is another compiler-defined macro _CET_ENDBR
>>>>> that can
>>>>> be used. We can put the following in calling.h:
>>>>>
>>>>> #ifdef __CET__
>>>>> #include <cet.h>
>>>>> #else
>>>>> #define _CET_ENDBR
>>>>> #endif
>>>>>
>>>>> and then use _CET_ENDBR in other files. How is that?
>>>>>
>>>>> In the future, in case we have kernel-mode IBT, ENDBR macros are
>>>>> also needed
>>>>> for other assembly files.
>>>>
>>>> Can we please call it IBT_ENDBR or just ENDBR. CET is a horrible name,
>>>> seeing how it is not specific.
>>>>
>>>
>>> _CET_ENDBR is from the compiler and we cannot change it. We can do:
>>>
>>> #define ENDBR _CET_ENDBR
>>>
>>> How is that?
>>
>> Do we really want to include compiler headers? AFAICT it's not a
>> built-in. Also what about clang?
>>
>> This thing seems trivial enough to build our own, it's a single damn
>> instruction. That also means we don't have to worry about changes to
>> header files we don't control.
>>
>
> Then, what about moving what I had earlier to vdso.h?
> If we don't want __i386__ either, then make it two macros.
>
> +.macro ENDBR
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_CET
> +#ifdef __i386__
> + endbr32
> +#else
> + endbr64
> +#endif
> +#endif
> +.endm
I will make it like the following:
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso.h
index 98aa103eb4ab..4c0262dcb93d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso.h
@@ -52,6 +52,15 @@ extern int map_vdso_once(const struct vdso_image
*image, unsigned long addr);
extern bool fixup_vdso_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr,
unsigned long error_code,
unsigned long fault_addr);
-#endif /* __ASSEMBLER__ */
+#else /* __ASSEMBLER__ */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_CET
+#define ENDBR64 endbr64
+#define ENDBR32 endbr32
+#else /*!CONFIG_X86_CET */
+#define ENDBR64
+#define ENDBR32
+#endif
+#endif /* __ASSEMBLER__ */
#endif /* _ASM_X86_VDSO_H */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists