[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210317080744.33f5c6a9@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:07:44 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the hyperv tree with the tip tree
Hi all,
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:05:54 +0000 Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Right,
> >
> > so tglx and I took a quick look and came to the conclusion that it would
> > be best if you - provided it is not too much trouble - keep applying
> > this patch so that linux-next can get tested properly and we - Wei or I
> > - explain this merge conflict in our pull requests during the next merge
> > window and ask Linus to merge your patch ontop. This way we'll save us
> > the cross-tree merging dance.
>
> Totally agreed. :-)
>
> I've made a note to inform Linus about this in the next merge window.
No worries, I will keep applying the patch (my setup allows that to
happen automatically). Linus should apply it as a part of the merge
resolution (as do I).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists