lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210316041739.GC1798@thinkpad>
Date:   Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:47:39 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Edgar Bernardi Righi <edgar.righi@...tec.org.br>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] clk: actions: Fix bisp_factor_table based clocks on
 Owl S500 SoC

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 07:18:28PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> The following clocks of the Actions Semi Owl S500 SoC have been defined
> to use a shared clock factor table 'bisp_factor_table[]': DE[1-2], VCE,
> VDE, BISP, SENSOR[0-1]
> 
> There are several issues involved in this approach:
> 
> * 'bisp_factor_table[]' describes the configuration of a regular 8-rates
>   divider, so its usage is redundant. Additionally, judging by the BISP
>   clock context, it is incomplete since it maps only 8 out of 12
>   possible entries.
> 
> * The clocks mentioned above are not identical in terms of the available
>   rates, therefore cannot rely on the same factor table. Specifically,
>   BISP and SENSOR* are standard 12-rate dividers so their configuration
>   should rely on a proper clock div table, while VCE and VDE require a
>   factor table that is a actually a subset of the one needed for DE[1-2]
>   clocks.
> 
> Let's fix this by implementing the following:
> 
> * Add new factor tables 'de_factor_table' and 'hde_factor_table' to
>   properly handle DE[1-2], VCE and VDE clocks.
> 
> * Add a common div table 'std12rate_div_table' for BISP and SENSOR[0-1]
>   clocks converted to OWL_COMP_DIV.
> 
> * Drop the now unused 'bisp_factor_table[]'.
> 

Nice!

> Additionally, since SENSOR[0-1] are not gated, unset the OWL_GATE_HW
> configuration and drop the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag in their definitions.
> 

No. You should not screen the functionality exposed by the hw, that's what the
purpose of these CLK_ flags.

Other than that, this patch looks good to me.

> Fixes: ed6b4795ece4 ("clk: actions: Add clock driver for S500 SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c
> index 69cd959205f5..abe8874353de 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c
> @@ -138,9 +138,16 @@ static struct clk_factor_table sd_factor_table[] = {
>  	{ 0, 0, 0 },
>  };
>  
> -static struct clk_factor_table bisp_factor_table[] = {
> -	{ 0, 1, 1 }, { 1, 1, 2 }, { 2, 1, 3 }, { 3, 1, 4 },
> -	{ 4, 1, 5 }, { 5, 1, 6 }, { 6, 1, 7 }, { 7, 1, 8 },
> +static struct clk_factor_table de_factor_table[] = {
> +	{ 0, 1, 1 }, { 1, 2, 3 }, { 2, 1, 2 }, { 3, 2, 5 },
> +	{ 4, 1, 3 }, { 5, 1, 4 }, { 6, 1, 6 }, { 7, 1, 8 },
> +	{ 8, 1, 12 },
> +	{ 0, 0, 0 },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_factor_table hde_factor_table[] = {
> +	{ 0, 1, 1 }, { 1, 2, 3 }, { 2, 1, 2 }, { 3, 2, 5 },
> +	{ 4, 1, 3 }, { 5, 1, 4 }, { 6, 1, 6 }, { 7, 1, 8 },
>  	{ 0, 0, 0 },
>  };
>  
> @@ -154,6 +161,13 @@ static struct clk_div_table rmii_ref_div_table[] = {
>  	{ 0, 0 },
>  };
>  
> +static struct clk_div_table std12rate_div_table[] = {
> +	{ 0, 1 }, { 1, 2 }, { 2, 3 }, { 3, 4 },
> +	{ 4, 5 }, { 5, 6 }, { 6, 7 }, { 7, 8 },
> +	{ 8, 9 }, { 9, 10 }, { 10, 11 }, { 11, 12 },
> +	{ 0, 0 },
> +};
> +
>  static struct clk_div_table i2s_div_table[] = {
>  	{ 0, 1 }, { 1, 2 }, { 2, 3 }, { 3, 4 },
>  	{ 4, 6 }, { 5, 8 }, { 6, 12 }, { 7, 16 },
> @@ -189,39 +203,39 @@ static OWL_DIVIDER(rmii_ref_clk, "rmii_ref_clk", "ethernet_pll_clk", CMU_ETHERNE
>  
>  /* factor clocks */
>  static OWL_FACTOR(ahb_clk, "ahb_clk", "h_clk", CMU_BUSCLK1, 2, 2, ahb_factor_table, 0, 0);
> -static OWL_FACTOR(de1_clk, "de_clk1", "de_clk", CMU_DECLK, 0, 3, bisp_factor_table, 0, 0);
> -static OWL_FACTOR(de2_clk, "de_clk2", "de_clk", CMU_DECLK, 4, 3, bisp_factor_table, 0, 0);
> +static OWL_FACTOR(de1_clk, "de_clk1", "de_clk", CMU_DECLK, 0, 4, de_factor_table, 0, 0);
> +static OWL_FACTOR(de2_clk, "de_clk2", "de_clk", CMU_DECLK, 4, 4, de_factor_table, 0, 0);
>  
>  /* composite clocks */
>  static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(vce_clk, "vce_clk", hde_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_VCECLK, 4, 2),
>  			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 26, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_VCECLK, 0, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> +			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_VCECLK, 0, 3, 0, hde_factor_table),
>  			0);
>  
>  static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(vde_clk, "vde_clk", hde_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_VDECLK, 4, 2),
>  			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 25, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_VDECLK, 0, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> +			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_VDECLK, 0, 3, 0, hde_factor_table),
>  			0);
>  
> -static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(bisp_clk, "bisp_clk", bisp_clk_mux_p,
> +static OWL_COMP_DIV(bisp_clk, "bisp_clk", bisp_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_BISPCLK, 4, 1),
>  			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 14, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_BISPCLK, 0, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> +			OWL_DIVIDER_HW(CMU_BISPCLK, 0, 4, 0, std12rate_div_table),
>  			0);
>  
> -static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(sensor0_clk, "sensor0_clk", sensor_clk_mux_p,
> +static OWL_COMP_DIV(sensor0_clk, "sensor0_clk", sensor_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 4, 1),
> -			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 14, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 0, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> -			CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED);
> +			{ 0 },
> +			OWL_DIVIDER_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 0, 4, 0, std12rate_div_table),
> +			0);
>  
> -static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(sensor1_clk, "sensor1_clk", sensor_clk_mux_p,
> +static OWL_COMP_DIV(sensor1_clk, "sensor1_clk", sensor_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 4, 1),
> -			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 14, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 8, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> -			CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED);
> +			{ 0 },
> +			OWL_DIVIDER_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 8, 4, 0, std12rate_div_table),
> +			0);
>  
>  static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(sd0_clk, "sd0_clk", sd_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_SD0CLK, 9, 1),
> -- 
> 2.30.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ