[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F969CAE6-AEC4-4FEE-A200-74110A042C8D@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 21:10:08 -0400
From: "Zi Yan" <ziy@...dia.com>
To: "kernel test robot" <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: "Zi Yan" <zi.yan@...t.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
"Sandipan Das" <sandipan@...ux.ibm.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mm: huge_memory: a new debugfs interface for
splitting THP tests.
On 15 Mar 2021, at 20:36, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Zi,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on kselftest/next]
> [also build test WARNING on linux/master linus/master v5.12-rc3]
> [cannot apply to hnaz-linux-mm/master next-20210315]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Zi-Yan/mm-huge_memory-a-new-debugfs-interface-for-splitting-THP-tests/20210316-043528
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git next
> config: i386-randconfig-m021-20210315 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>
> smatch warnings:
> mm/huge_memory.c:3086 split_huge_pages_write() warn: sscanf doesn't return error codes
>
> vim +3086 mm/huge_memory.c
>
> 3051
> 3052 static ssize_t split_huge_pages_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> 3053 size_t count, loff_t *ppops)
> 3054 {
> 3055 static DEFINE_MUTEX(mutex);
> 3056 ssize_t ret;
> 3057 char input_buf[80]; /* hold pid, start_vaddr, end_vaddr */
> 3058 int pid;
> 3059 unsigned long vaddr_start, vaddr_end;
> 3060
> 3061 ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&mutex);
> 3062 if (ret)
> 3063 return ret;
> 3064
> 3065 ret = -EFAULT;
> 3066
> 3067 memset(input_buf, 0, 80);
> 3068 if (copy_from_user(input_buf, buf, min_t(size_t, count, 80)))
> 3069 goto out;
> 3070
> 3071 input_buf[79] = '\0';
> 3072 ret = sscanf(input_buf, "%d,0x%lx,0x%lx", &pid, &vaddr_start, &vaddr_end);
> 3073 if (ret == 1 && pid == 1) {
> 3074 split_huge_pages_all();
> 3075 ret = strlen(input_buf);
> 3076 goto out;
> 3077 } else if (ret != 3) {
> 3078 ret = -EINVAL;
> 3079 goto out;
> 3080 }
> 3081
> 3082 if (!split_huge_pages_pid(pid, vaddr_start, vaddr_end))
> 3083 ret = strlen(input_buf);
Change this to:
ret = split_huge_pages_pid(pid, vaddr_start, vaddr_end);
if (!ret)
ret = strlen(input_buf);
should fix the warning. I will resend after I get feedback for the patches.
> 3084 out:
> 3085 mutex_unlock(&mutex);
>> 3086 return ret;
> 3087
—
Best Regards,
Yan Zi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (855 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists