[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOFY-A2q4otqu=pD60tUiD0GTDZnpcm+zajFp6SRDh4VixbV2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 23:28:08 -0700
From: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@...gle.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: Arjun Roy <arjunroy.kdev@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Subject: Re: [mm, net-next v2] mm: net: memcg accounting for TCP rx zerocopy
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:22 PM Arjun Roy <arjunroy@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 9:29 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 9:20 PM Arjun Roy <arjunroy@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > [...]
> > > >
> > >
> > > Apologies for the spam - looks like I forgot to rebase the first time
> > > I sent this out.
> > >
> > > Actually, on a related note, it's not 100% clear to me whether this
> > > patch (which in its current form, applies to net-next) should instead
> > > be based on the mm branch - but the most recent (clean) checkout of mm
> > > fails to build for me so net-next for now.
> > >
> >
> > It is due to "mm: page-writeback: simplify memcg handling in
> > test_clear_page_writeback()" patch in the mm tree. You would need to
> > reintroduce the lock_page_memcg() which returns the memcg and make
> > __unlock_page_memcg() non-static.
>
> To clarify, Shakeel - the tag "tag: v5.12-rc2-mmots-2021-03-11-21-49"
> fails to build on a clean checkout, without this patch, due to a
> compilation failure in mm/shmem.c, for reference:
> https://pastebin.com/raw/12eSGdGD
> (and that's why I'm basing this patch off of net-next in this email).
>
> -Arjun
Another seeming anomaly - the patch sent out passes
scripts/checkpatch.pl but netdev/checkpatch finds plenty of actionable
fixes here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210316041645.144249-1-arjunroy.kdev@gmail.com/
Is netdev using some other automated checker instead of scripts/checkpatch.pl?
-Arjun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists