[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFB9OtuAEXPfSJk3@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:41:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Huaixin Chang <changhuaixin@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: bsegall@...gle.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mgorman@...e.de, mingo@...hat.com,
odin@...d.al, odin@...dal.com, pauld@...head.com, pjt@...gle.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, shanpeic@...ux.alibaba.com, tj@...nel.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] sched/fair: Introduce primitives for CFS
bandwidth burst
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:49:28PM +0800, Huaixin Chang wrote:
> In this patch, we introduce the notion of CFS bandwidth burst. Unused
> "quota" from pervious "periods" might be accumulated and used in the
> following "periods". The maximum amount of accumulated bandwidth is
> bounded by "burst". And the maximun amount of CPU a group can consume in
> a given period is "buffer" which is equivalent to "quota" + "burst in
> case that this group has done enough accumulation.
Complete lack of why though. Why am I going to spend time looking at
this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists