[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYdHgP7QNWco4aN1G-GaRjOd2Y=_fkxv4zOKsQtXtpqfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:13:56 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
Necip Fazil Yildiran <fazilyildiran@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/22] pinctrl: add BCM63XX pincontrol support
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:42 PM Álvaro Fernández Rojas
<noltari@...il.com> wrote:
> v7: introduce changes suggested by Rob Herring.
If Rob is happy with the bindings like this (GPIO as parallel node rathern
than subnode) I am ready to merge this.
As long as the bindings are OK I am pretty sure any remaining nits can
be fixed in-tree.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists