[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1615893602-22260-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 19:20:02 +0800
From: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: swait: use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up_state()
Why not just use wake_up_process().
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
---
kernel/sched/swait.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/swait.c b/kernel/sched/swait.c
index e1c655f..7a24925
--- a/kernel/sched/swait.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/swait.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ void swake_up_all(struct swait_queue_head *q)
while (!list_empty(&tmp)) {
curr = list_first_entry(&tmp, typeof(*curr), task_list);
- wake_up_state(curr->task, TASK_NORMAL);
+ wake_up_process(curr->task);
list_del_init(&curr->task_list);
if (list_empty(&tmp))
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists