linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/15] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused code blocks conditioned by never set CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:39:19 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused code blocks
 conditioned by never set CONFIG_PM

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:15:02AM +0100, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> remove conditional code blocks checked by unused CONFIG_PM
> 
> cleaning required in TODO file:
> 
> find and remove code blocks guarded by never set CONFIG_FOO defines
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c | 8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c
> index 2ff71d001c07..5748e1c1a25c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c
> @@ -3198,14 +3198,6 @@ static void rtw_cfg80211_preinit_wiphy(struct adapter *padapter, struct wiphy *w
>  	wiphy->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_HAS_REMAIN_ON_CHANNEL;
>  	wiphy->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_OFFCHAN_TX | WIPHY_FLAG_HAVE_AP_SME;
>  
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PM)
> -	wiphy->max_sched_scan_reqs = 1;
> -#endif
> -
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PM)
> -	wiphy->wowlan = &wowlan_stub;
> -#endif

How this is "unused"?  This is a real config option, did you just change
the logic here?

thanks,

greg k-h