[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <323da8a0-d4d9-6c2d-bbb7-6529e588cdea@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 19:21:48 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>,
michal.simek@...inx.com, shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com,
sgoud@...inx.com
Cc: wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
git@...inx.com, Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] watchdog: of_xilinx_wdt: Add comment to spinlock
On 3/15/21 3:46 AM, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
> From: Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@...inx.com>
>
> Based on checkpatch every spinlock should be documented.
> The patch is fixing this issue:
> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict -f drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> CHECK: spinlock_t definition without comment
> + spinlock_t spinlock;
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@...inx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> index 7fe4f7c3f7ce..00549164b3d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
> struct xwdt_device {
> void __iomem *base;
> u32 wdt_interval;
> - spinlock_t spinlock;
> + spinlock_t spinlock; /* spinlock for register handling */
> struct watchdog_device xilinx_wdt_wdd;
> struct clk *clk;
> };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists