[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b4ba82c-d6a8-a0f8-cc3d-e8aece36910a@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 19:27:45 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>,
michal.simek@...inx.com, shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com,
sgoud@...inx.com
Cc: wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
git@...inx.com, Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] watchdog: of_xilinx_wdt: Used dev_dbg()
On 3/15/21 3:46 AM, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
> From: Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@...inx.com>
>
> This patch removes pr_info in stop function and adds dev_dbg()
> in start/stop function to display device specific debug info.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@...inx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> index 0d7df2370db7..9e67b598907e 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static int xilinx_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> int ret;
> u32 control_status_reg;
> struct xwdt_device *xdev = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
> + struct watchdog_device *xilinx_wdt_wdd = &xdev->xilinx_wdt_wdd;
>
This is the same as wdd and thus pointless.
> ret = clk_enable(xdev->clk);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -70,6 +71,8 @@ static int xilinx_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>
> spin_unlock(&xdev->spinlock);
>
> + dev_dbg(xilinx_wdt_wdd->parent, "Watchdog Started!\n");
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -77,6 +80,7 @@ static int xilinx_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> {
> u32 control_status_reg;
> struct xwdt_device *xdev = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
> + struct watchdog_device *xilinx_wdt_wdd = &xdev->xilinx_wdt_wdd;
>
Same as above: This is the same as wdd and thus pointless.
> spin_lock(&xdev->spinlock);
>
> @@ -91,7 +95,7 @@ static int xilinx_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>
> clk_disable(xdev->clk);
>
> - pr_info("Stopped!\n");
> + dev_dbg(xilinx_wdt_wdd->parent, "Watchdog Stopped!\n");
>
> return 0;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists