linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v23 6/9] x86/entry: Introduce ENDBR macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f98c600a-80e4-62f0-9c97-eeed708d998d@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Mar 2021 08:49:20 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
        Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
        Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
        Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...el.com>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v23 6/9] x86/entry: Introduce ENDBR macro

On 3/16/21 8:13 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
> @@ -392,3 +392,21 @@ For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is built with
>  .endm
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> +/*
> + * ENDBR is an instruction for the Indirect Branch Tracking (IBT) component
> + * of CET.  IBT prevents attacks by ensuring that (most) indirect branches
> + * function calls may only land at ENDBR instructions.  Branches that don't
> + * follow the rules will result in control flow (#CF) exceptions.
> + * ENDBR is a noop when IBT is unsupported or disabled.  Most ENDBR
> + * instructions are inserted automatically by the compiler, but branch
> + * targets written in assembly must have ENDBR added manually.
> + */
> +.macro ENDBR
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_CET
> +#ifdef __i386__
> +	endbr32
> +#else
> +	endbr64
> +#endif
> +#endif
> +.endm

Is "#ifdef __i386__" the right thing to use here?  I guess ENDBR only
ends up getting used in the VDSO, but there's a lot of
non-userspace-exposed stuff in calling.h.  It seems a bit weird to have
the normally userspace-only __i386__ in there.

I don't see any existing direct use of __i386__ in arch/x86/entry/vdso.