linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: Charge active memcg when no mm is set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Mar 2021 08:50:16 -0700
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To:     Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
        Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
        "open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: Charge active memcg when no mm is set

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 8:37 AM Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com> wrote:
>
> memalloc_use_memcg() worked for kernel allocations but was silently
> ignored for user pages.

set_active_memcg()

>
> This patch establishes a precedence order for who gets charged:
>
> 1. If there is a memcg associated with the page already, that memcg is
>    charged. This happens during swapin.
>
> 2. If an explicit mm is passed, mm->memcg is charged. This happens
>    during page faults, which can be triggered in remote VMs (eg gup).
>
> 3. Otherwise consult the current process context. If it has configured
>    a current->active_memcg, use that. Otherwise, current->mm->memcg.

It's a bit more sophisticated than current->active_memcg. It has been
extended to work in interrupt context as well.

>
> Previously, if a NULL mm was passed to mem_cgroup_try_charge (case 3) it

mem_cgroup_charge()

> would always charge the root cgroup. Now it looks up the current
> active_memcg first (falling back to charging the root cgroup if not
> set).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> ---
>  mm/filemap.c    |  2 +-
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>  mm/shmem.c      |  4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 43700480d897..5135f330f05c 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ noinline int __add_to_page_cache_locked(struct page *page,
>         page->index = offset;
>
>         if (!huge) {
> -               error = mem_cgroup_charge(page, current->mm, gfp);
> +               error = mem_cgroup_charge(page, NULL, gfp);
>                 if (error)
>                         goto error;
>                 charged = true;
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index e064ac0d850a..9a1b23ed3412 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -6690,7 +6690,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_calculate_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root,
>   * @gfp_mask: reclaim mode
>   *
>   * Try to charge @page to the memcg that @mm belongs to, reclaiming
> - * pages according to @gfp_mask if necessary.
> + * pages according to @gfp_mask if necessary. if @mm is NULL, try to
> + * charge to the active memcg.
>   *
>   * Returns 0 on success. Otherwise, an error code is returned.
>   */
> @@ -6726,8 +6727,15 @@ int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>                 rcu_read_unlock();
>         }
>
> -       if (!memcg)
> -               memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(mm);
> +       if (!memcg) {
> +               if (!mm) {
> +                       memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_current();
> +                       if (!memcg)
> +                               memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(current->mm);
> +               } else {
> +                       memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(mm);
> +               }
> +       }

You will need to rebase to the latest mm tree. This code has changed.