linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: ipa: QMI fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:00:37 -0500
From:   Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        evgreen@...omium.org, cpratapa@...eaurora.org, elder@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: ipa: QMI fixes

On 3/15/21 10:25 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:50:15AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
>> On 3/15/21 11:38 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:21:09AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
>>>> Mani Sadhasivam discovered some errors in the definitions of some
>>>> QMI messages used for IPA.  This series addresses those errors,
>>>> and extends the definition of one message type to include some
>>>> newly-defined fields.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the patches. I guess you need to add Fixes tag for patches 1,2 and
>>> they should be backported to stable.
>>
>> I did not do that, intentionally.  The reason is that the
>> existing code only supports IPA v3.5.1 and IPAv4.2.  And
>> these bugs seem to cause no problems there.
>>
>> There are some patches coming very soon that will add
>> more formal support for IPA v4.5 (where I know you
>> found these issues).  Those will not be back-ported.
>>
>> So these fixes don't appear to be necessary for existing
>> supported platforms.
>>
> 
> Hmm, okay. Then please mention this information in the commit description(s)
> that the fix is only needed for IPA4.5.

Mani, you ACKed all three patches after you sent this.

Are you expecting me to send a new version of the code,
or are you willing to accept the series as-is?

Thanks.

					-Alex

> 
> Thanks,
> Mani
> 
>> If you still believe I should have these back-ported,
>> I have no objection to re-posting for that.  But I
>> wanted to explain my reasoning before doing it.
>>
>> --> Do you still think I should have these back-ported?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> 					-Alex
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mani
>>>
>>>> 					-Alex
>>>>
>>>> Alex Elder (3):
>>>>     net: ipa: fix a duplicated tlv_type value
>>>>     net: ipa: fix another QMI message definition
>>>>     net: ipa: extend the INDICATION_REGISTER request
>>>>
>>>>    drivers/net/ipa/ipa_qmi_msg.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>    drivers/net/ipa/ipa_qmi_msg.h |  6 ++-
>>>>    2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.27.0
>>>>
>>