linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] kernel panic: corrupted stack end in openat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3A=TVWWmog=1YsALUhsaSkqReNrao5OTRd5mwyd0pnig@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Mar 2021 17:03:28 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        syzbot <syzbot+0b06ef9b44d00d600183@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] kernel panic: corrupted stack end in openat

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 4:51 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:44:45PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:17 AM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > The compiler is gcc version 10.2.1 20210110 (Debian 10.2.1-6)
> >
> > Ok, building with Ubuntu 10.2.1-1ubuntu1 20201207 locally, that's
> > the closest I have installed, and I think the Debian and Ubuntu versions
> > are generally quite close in case of gcc since they are maintained by
> > the same packagers.
>
> ... which shouldn't be a problem - that's just over 1/4 of the stack
> space. Could it be the syzbot's gcc is doing something weird and
> inflating the stack frames?

It's possible, I think that's really unlikely given that it's just Debian's
gcc, which is as close to mainline as the version I was using.

Uwe's DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW patch from a while ago might
help if this was the problem though:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200108082913.29710-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de/

My best guess is something going wrong in the interrupt
that triggered the preempt_schedule() which ended up calling
task_stack_end_corrupted() in schedule_debug(), as you suggested
earlier.

       Arnd