[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFDb8AzfajvlZ6iS@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 17:25:20 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)" <x2019cwm@...x.ca>,
g@...ez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: 回复: [PATCH 01/10] tick/nohz: Prevent
tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() from returning negative value
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:08:08PM +0000, Zhou Ti (x2019cwm) wrote:
> But I don't think it's a good idea to handle this in callers, because
> logically the function shouldn't return negative values. Returning 0
> directly would allow idle governors to get another chance to select
> again.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists