[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210317090154.70aaf7e8c21eda290fc13d4e@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:01:54 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Xiaofeng Cao <cxfcosmos@...il.com>
Cc: naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xiaofeng Cao <caoxiaofeng@...ong.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel:kprobe: Fix typo issue
Hi Xiaofeng,
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 20:57:51 +0800
Xiaofeng Cao <cxfcosmos@...il.com> wrote:
> change 'immmediately' to 'immediately'
> change 'quiesence' to 'quiescence'
> change 'unneed' to 'unneeded'
> change 'sinec' to 'since
> change 'sefe' to 'safe''
> change 'And' to 'At the'
> change 'buy' to 'but'
Thanks for the fix!
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Cao <caoxiaofeng@...ong.com>
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 745f08fdd7a6..ae3a22d2099b 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ static void do_optimize_kprobes(void)
> /*
> * The optimization/unoptimization refers online_cpus via
> * stop_machine() and cpu-hotplug modifies online_cpus.
> - * And same time, text_mutex will be held in cpu-hotplug and here.
> + * At the same time, text_mutex will be held in cpu-hotplug and here.
> * This combination can cause a deadlock (cpu-hotplug try to lock
> * text_mutex but stop_machine can not be done because online_cpus
> * has been changed)
> @@ -592,12 +592,12 @@ static void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work)
>
> /*
> * Step 1: Unoptimize kprobes and collect cleaned (unused and disarmed)
> - * kprobes before waiting for quiesence period.
> + * kprobes before waiting for quiescence period.
> */
> do_unoptimize_kprobes();
>
> /*
> - * Step 2: Wait for quiesence period to ensure all potentially
> + * Step 2: Wait for quiescence period to ensure all potentially
> * preempted tasks to have normally scheduled. Because optprobe
> * may modify multiple instructions, there is a chance that Nth
> * instruction is preempted. In that case, such tasks can return
> @@ -607,10 +607,10 @@ static void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work)
> */
> synchronize_rcu_tasks();
>
> - /* Step 3: Optimize kprobes after quiesence period */
> + /* Step 3: Optimize kprobes after quiescence period */
> do_optimize_kprobes();
>
> - /* Step 4: Free cleaned kprobes after quiesence period */
> + /* Step 4: Free cleaned kprobes after quiescence period */
> do_free_cleaned_kprobes();
>
> mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> @@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ void wait_for_kprobe_optimizer(void)
> while (!list_empty(&optimizing_list) || !list_empty(&unoptimizing_list)) {
> mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
>
> - /* this will also make optimizing_work execute immmediately */
> + /* this will also make optimizing_work execute immediately */
> flush_delayed_work(&optimizing_work);
> /* @optimizing_work might not have been queued yet, relax */
> cpu_relax();
> @@ -1057,7 +1057,7 @@ static int __arm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p, struct ftrace_ops *ops,
>
> err_ftrace:
> /*
> - * At this point, sinec ops is not registered, we should be sefe from
> + * At this point, since ops is not registered, we should be safe from
> * registering empty filter.
> */
> ftrace_set_filter_ip(ops, (unsigned long)p->addr, 1, 0);
> @@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@ static struct kprobe *__disable_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> /*
> * If kprobes_all_disarmed is set, orig_p
> * should have already been disarmed, so
> - * skip unneed disarming process.
> + * skip unneeded disarming process.
> */
> if (!kprobes_all_disarmed) {
> ret = disarm_kprobe(orig_p, true);
> @@ -2424,7 +2424,7 @@ static int kprobes_module_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> within_module_core((unsigned long)p->addr, mod))) {
> /*
> * The vaddr this probe is installed will soon
> - * be vfreed buy not synced to disk. Hence,
> + * be vfreed but not synced to disk. Hence,
> * disarming the breakpoint isn't needed.
> *
> * Note, this will also move any optimized probes
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists