linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] EDAC: use NULL instead of using plain integer as pointer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 12:33:37 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     tony.luck@...el.com, qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
        james.morse@....com, rric@...nel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: use NULL instead of using plain integer as pointer

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 03:47:25PM +0800, Yang Li wrote:
> This fixes the following sparse warnings:
> drivers/edac/sb_edac.c:433:10: warning: Using plain integer as NULL
> pointer
> drivers/edac/sb_edac.c:499:10: warning: Using plain integer as NULL
> pointer
> drivers/edac/sb_edac.c:570:10: warning: Using plain integer as NULL
> pointer
> drivers/edac/sb_edac.c:614:10: warning: Using plain integer as NULL
> pointer
> drivers/edac/sb_edac.c:680:10: warning: Using plain integer as NULL
> pointer
> 
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> index 93daa42..a99df55 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ struct sbridge_pvt {
>  
>  static const struct pci_id_table pci_dev_descr_sbridge_table[] = {
>  	PCI_ID_TABLE_ENTRY(pci_dev_descr_sbridge, ARRAY_SIZE(pci_dev_descr_sbridge), 1, SANDY_BRIDGE),
> -	{0,}			/* 0 terminated list. */
> +	{NULL,}			/* 0 terminated list. */

Why does this matter for list terminators?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette