[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5B9hGHei56riPCvOjx-TmwLiEtB=3m4WZh5b8bsWowBpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:57:31 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@...il.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: configs: Enable PCIe support for imx8mq boards
Hi Heiko,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 8:52 AM Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@...il.com> wrote:
> > Do we really want it to be built-in? If so, it would be nice to have some
> > comments about that in commit log.
>
> Why would you not want it? I see other SOC PCI controllers are also
> enabled. I would like to have it because we have an Intel e1000 on our
> pitx-imx8m board and the seconds PCI slot is for a m.2 card. So we
> would have the PCI support with the default defconfig. On the NXP
> imx8mq EVK a m.2 is connected to the PCI interface.
>
> Is this the kind of comments you want?
You have selected the driver to be built-in:
CONFIG_PCI_IMX6=y
Shawn's question is why it needs to be built-in instead of a kernel module:
CONFIG_PCI_IMX6=m
On arch/arm64/configs/defconfig the preference is to select the
options as modules, whenever possible.
If it can't be a module and needs to be built-in, then please provide
a justification in the commit log.
Hope this can clarify.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists