lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d4b370dc76543f2ba8ad7c6dcdfc7af@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 12:51:58 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Christophe Leroy' <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
CC:     Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH mm] kfence: fix printk format for ptrdiff_t

From: Christophe Leroy
> Sent: 16 March 2021 15:41
...
> >> include/linux/types.h:typedef __kernel_ptrdiff_t	ptrdiff_t;
> >>
> >> And get:
> >>
> >>    CC      mm/kfence/report.o
> >> In file included from ./include/linux/printk.h:7,
> >>                   from ./include/linux/kernel.h:16,
> >>                   from mm/kfence/report.c:10:
> >> mm/kfence/report.c: In function 'kfence_report_error':
> >> ./include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%td' expects argument
> >> of type 'ptrdiff_t', but argument 6 has type 'long int' [-Wformat=]
> >
> > This is declared as
> >          const ptrdiff_t object_index = meta ? meta - kfence_metadata : -1;
> > so maybe something with that goes wrong?  What happens if you delete the
> > (useless) "const" here?

The obvious thing to try is changing it to 'int'.
That will break 64bit builds, but if it fixes the 32bit one
it will tell you what type gcc is expecting.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ