[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82fd0514-dc2e-c908-56d1-73143762540b@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 20:59:37 +0800
From: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@...wei.com>
To: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@...nel.org>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@...hat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
<wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com>, <jiangkunkun@...wei.com>,
<yuzenghui@...wei.com>, <lushenming@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Scan leaf TTD to sync
hardware dirty log
On 2021/3/17 18:44, Yi Sun wrote:
> On 21-03-10 17:06:09, Keqian Zhu wrote:
>> From: jiangkunkun <jiangkunkun@...wei.com>
>>
>> During dirty log tracking, user will try to retrieve dirty log from
>> iommu if it supports hardware dirty log.
>>
>> This adds a new interface named sync_dirty_log in iommu layer and
>> arm smmuv3 implements it, which scans leaf TTD and treats it's dirty
>> if it's writable (As we just enable HTTU for stage1, so check whether
>> AP[2] is not set).
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>
>> changelog:
>>
>> v2:
>> - Add new sanity check in arm_smmu_sync_dirty_log(). (smmu_domain->stage != ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1)
>> - Document the purpose of flush_iotlb in arm_smmu_sync_dirty_log(). (Robin)
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 30 +++++++
>> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 38 +++++++++
>> include/linux/io-pgtable.h | 4 +
>> include/linux/iommu.h | 18 +++++
>> 5 files changed, 180 insertions(+)
>>
> Please split iommu common interface out. Thanks!
Yes, I will do it in v3.
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>> index 2a10294b62a3..44dfb78f9050 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>> @@ -2850,6 +2850,44 @@ int iommu_stop_dirty_log(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_stop_dirty_log);
>>
>> +int iommu_sync_dirty_log(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>> + size_t size, unsigned long *bitmap,
>> + unsigned long base_iova, unsigned long bitmap_pgshift)
>
> One open question: shall we add PASID as one parameter to make iommu
> know which address space to visit?
>
> For live migration, the pasid should not be necessary. But considering
Sure, for live migration we just need to care about level/stage 2 mapping under nested mode.
> future extension, it may be required.
It sounds a good idea. I will consider this, thanks!
>
> BRs,
> Yi Sun
> .
>
Thanks,
Keqian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists