[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210317144004.GA6593@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:40:04 +0000
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Disable vSGI upon (GIC CPUIF <
v4.1) detection
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:04:36PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:07:19 +0000,
> Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> wrote:
> >
> > GIC CPU interfaces versions predating GIC v4.1 were not built to
> > accommodate vINTID within the vSGI range; as reported in the GIC
> > specifications (8.2 "Changes to the CPU interface"), it is
> > CONSTRAINED UNPREDICTABLE to deliver a vSGI to a PE with
> > ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.GIC < b0011.
> >
> > Check the GIC CPUIF version by reading the SYS_ID_AA64_PFR0_EL1.
> >
> > Disable vSGIs if a CPUIF version < 4.1 is detected to prevent using
> > vSGIs on systems where they may misbehave.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>
> Does it need to go in as a fix? or can it just be pushed into 5.13?
> Given that there is no such HW in the wild just yet, I'm inclined to
> do the latter...
I agree with you; it is to make the driver/vgic robust against HW
misconfigurations (because that's what they are and I am not aware of
any _existing_ HW with such a misconfiguration - yet), 5.13 will
perfectly do.
Thanks a lot.
Lorenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists