[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210317151159.GA488655@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:11:59 -0400
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: taehyun cho <taehyun.cho@...sung.com>
Cc: balbi@...nel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: remove 'pm_runtime_set_active' in resume
callback
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 05:25:20PM +0900, taehyun cho wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:13:35AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 04:43:17PM +0900, taehyun cho wrote:
> > > 'pm_runtime_set_active' sets a flag to describe rumtime status.
> > > This flag is automatically set in pm_runtime_get_sync/put_sync API.
> > > 'pm_runtime_set_active' checks the runtime status of parent device.
> > > As a result, the below error message is printed.
> > > dwc3 11110000.dwc3: runtime PM trying to activate child device
> > > 11110000.dwc3 but parent (11110000.usb) is not active.
> >
> > This is very suspicious. That error message indicates a real error is
> > present; removing these pm_runtime_set_active calls won't fix the error.
> >
> > You need to determine why the parent platform device 11110000.usb isn't
> > active when the dwc3 probe and resume routines are called. It seems
> > likely that there is a bug in the platform device's driver.
> >
> > Alan Stern
> >
>
> Alan,
>
> Thanks to your comments, I checked our platform device driver and found
> the problem. Our parent platform device didn't set active in resume
> callback. This made a problem.
Ah, good. Does the platform driver set the active flag in its probe
routine?
> Thank you for the help and sorry for
> disturbing you.
No problem at all.
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists