linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip 0/3] x86/kprobes: Remoev single-step trap from x86 kprobes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:45:08 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 0/3] x86/kprobes: Remoev single-step trap from x86 kprobes

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:27 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:55:22PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > Would you think you still need this series to remove iret to kernel?
>
> They're an improvement anyway, let me queue them so that they don't get
> lost.
>
> I'll line them up for tip/x86/core unless anybody else thinks of a
> better place for them and tells me in time ;-)

I agree.  The new code is quite nice.  I'm still not quite sure what
I'm doing with IRET, but thank you very much for the kprobe
improvements.