linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] objtool,static_call: Don't emit static_call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YFJuMi9ZSJk5Ctvw@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 23:01:38 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
        Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, jbaron@...mai.com,
        lkp@...ts.01.org, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool,static_call: Don't emit static_call_site for
 .exit.text

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:45:57PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 05:25:48PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > Thanks Peter for this fix. It does work for me on qemu for x86. Can
> > you turn this into a proper fix patch? BTW, feel free to add:
> 
> Per the below, the original patch ought to be fixed as well, to not use
> static_call() in __exit.
> 
> ---
> Subject: objtool,static_call: Don't emit static_call_site for .exit.text
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Wed Mar 17 13:35:05 CET 2021
> 
> Functions marked __exit are (somewhat surprisingly) discarded at
> runtime when built-in. This means that static_call(), when used in
> __exit functions, will generate static_call_site entries that point
> into reclaimed space.
> 
> Simply skip such sites and emit a WARN about it. By not emitting a
> static_call_site the site will remain pointed at the trampoline, which
> is also maintained, so things will work as expected, albeit with the
> extra indirection.
> 
> The WARN is so that people are aware of this; and arguably it simply
> isn't a good idea to use static_call() in __exit code anyway, since
> module unload is never a performance critical path.
> 
> Reported-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Tested-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>


Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>

/Jarkko

> ---
>  tools/objtool/check.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/tools/objtool/check.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
> @@ -850,6 +850,22 @@ static int add_ignore_alternatives(struc
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void static_call_add(struct instruction *insn,
> +				   struct objtool_file *file)
> +{
> +	if (!insn->call_dest->static_call_tramp)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!strcmp(insn->sec->name, ".exit.text")) {
> +		WARN_FUNC("static_call in .exit.text, skipping inline patching",
> +			  insn->sec, insn->offset);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	list_add_tail(&insn->static_call_node,
> +		      &file->static_call_list);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Find the destination instructions for all jumps.
>   */
> @@ -888,10 +904,7 @@ static int add_jump_destinations(struct
>  		} else if (insn->func) {
>  			/* internal or external sibling call (with reloc) */
>  			insn->call_dest = reloc->sym;
> -			if (insn->call_dest->static_call_tramp) {
> -				list_add_tail(&insn->static_call_node,
> -					      &file->static_call_list);
> -			}
> +			static_call_add(insn, file);
>  			continue;
>  		} else if (reloc->sym->sec->idx) {
>  			dest_sec = reloc->sym->sec;
> @@ -950,10 +963,7 @@ static int add_jump_destinations(struct
>  
>  				/* internal sibling call (without reloc) */
>  				insn->call_dest = insn->jump_dest->func;
> -				if (insn->call_dest->static_call_tramp) {
> -					list_add_tail(&insn->static_call_node,
> -						      &file->static_call_list);
> -				}
> +				static_call_add(insn, file);
>  			}
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -2746,10 +2756,8 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtoo
>  			if (dead_end_function(file, insn->call_dest))
>  				return 0;
>  
> -			if (insn->type == INSN_CALL && insn->call_dest->static_call_tramp) {
> -				list_add_tail(&insn->static_call_node,
> -					      &file->static_call_list);
> -			}
> +			if (insn->type == INSN_CALL)
> +				static_call_add(insn, file);
>  
>  			break;
>  
>