linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 00/14] huge vmalloc mappings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210317155843.c15e71f966f1e4da508dea04@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:58:43 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
        Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/14] huge vmalloc mappings

On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:23:48 +1000 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com> wrote:

> 
> *** BLURB HERE ***
> 

That's really not what it means ;)

Could we please get a nice description for the [0/n]?  What's it all
about, what's the benefit, what are potential downsides.

And performance testing results!  Because if it ain't faster, there's
no point in merging it?