[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210318001729.06cdb8d6.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:17:29 +0100
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] s390/vfio-ap: fix circular lockdep when
setting/clearing crypto masks
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:05:59 -0500
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> - ret = vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(mdev);
> + matrix_mdev = mdev_get_drvdata(mdev);
Is it guaranteed that matrix_mdev can't be NULL here? If yes, please
remind me of the mechanism that ensures this.
> +
> + /*
> + * If the KVM pointer is in the process of being set, wait until
> + * the process has completed.
> + */
> + wait_event_cmd(matrix_mdev->wait_for_kvm,
> + matrix_mdev->kvm_busy == false,
> + mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock),
> + mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock));
> +
> + if (matrix_mdev->kvm)
> + ret = vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(mdev);
> + else
> + ret = -ENODEV;
Didn't we agree to make the call to vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues()
unconditional again (for reference please take look at
Message-ID: <64afa72c-2d6a-2ca1-e576-34e15fa579ed@...ux.ibm.com>)?
Regards,
Halil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists