[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210317022255.2536745-6-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 02:22:39 +0000
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: "Shuah Khan" <shuah@...nel.org>, "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Reinette Chatre" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"Babu Moger" <babu.moger@....com>,
"Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kselftest" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 05/21] selftests/resctrl: Ensure sibling CPU is not same as original CPU
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
The resctrl tests can accept a CPU on which the tests are run and use
default of CPU #1 if it is not provided. In the CAT test a "sibling CPU"
is determined that is from the same package where another thread will be
run.
The current algorithm with which a "sibling CPU" is determined does not
take the provided/default CPU into account and when that CPU is the
first CPU in a package then the "sibling CPU" will be selected to be the
same CPU since it starts by picking the first CPU from core_siblings_list.
Fix the "sibling CPU" selection by taking the provided/default CPU into
account and ensuring a sibling that is a different CPU is selected.
Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
---
Change Log:
v5:
- Move from v4's patch 8 to this patch as the fix patch should be first
(Shuah).
tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
index 4174e48e06d1..bc52076bee7f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ int get_core_sibling(int cpu_no)
while (token) {
sibling_cpu_no = atoi(token);
/* Skipping core 0 as we don't want to run test on core 0 */
- if (sibling_cpu_no != 0)
+ if (sibling_cpu_no != 0 && sibling_cpu_no != cpu_no)
break;
token = strtok(NULL, "-,");
}
--
2.31.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists